CN vs. MAGC
CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) and MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) are both China Equities funds. CN is passively managed, while MAGC is actively managed. CN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MAGC.
Performance
CN vs. MAGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGC
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -18.25%
- 6M
- -19.75%
- 1Y
- -19.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CN vs. MAGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | -18.25% | 16.35% | -14.54% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CN vs. MAGC — Risk / Return Rank
CN
MAGC
CN vs. MAGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CN | MAGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.34 | — |
Drawdowns
CN vs. MAGC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CN | MAGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -32.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -31.30% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -15.16% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.09% | — |
Volatility
CN vs. MAGC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CN | MAGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 26.82% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 34.42% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 34.42% | — |
CN vs. MAGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CN vs. MAGC - Dividend Comparison
CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | 5.02% | 4.10% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MAGC.
MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 0.00% for CN.
They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.59% for MAGC.
Find the right allocation for CN and MAGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer