PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMT vs. ADMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMT vs. ADMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMT achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly higher than ADMA's -53.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CMT has outperformed ADMA with an annualized return of 5.78%, while ADMA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.15% annualized return.


CMT

1D
-1.93%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
16.41%
6M
15.15%
1Y
41.97%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
5.78%

ADMA

1D
3.13%
1M
4.00%
YTD
-53.02%
6M
-56.89%
1Y
-51.69%
3Y*
30.34%
5Y*
38.86%
10Y*
2.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMT vs. ADMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMT
Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
16.41%21.22%-10.74%42.65%52.64%-39.56%333.23%-54.29%-67.03%27.42%
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
-53.02%6.36%279.42%16.49%175.18%-27.69%-51.25%67.36%-25.55%-37.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CMT and ADMA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.08

Fundamentals

EPS

CMT:

$1.48

ADMA:

$0.68

PE Ratio

CMT:

15.77

ADMA:

12.66

PS Ratio

CMT:

0.56

ADMA:

4.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMT:

$270.93M

ADMA:

$509.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMT:

$44.31M

ADMA:

$312.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

CMT:

$18.05M

ADMA:

$218.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMT vs. ADMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMT
CMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ADMA
ADMA Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ADMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADMA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ADMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADMA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMT vs. ADMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMTADMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.82

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

-0.83

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.00

-1.66

+5.66

CMT vs. ADMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the ADMA Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMT and ADMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMT vs. ADMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMT drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than ADMA's maximum drawdown of -91.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMT and ADMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMTADMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-91.28%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.89%

-62.71%

+42.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.95%

-68.99%

+13.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.95%

-68.99%

+13.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.45%

-86.11%

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.28%

-65.03%

+43.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.30%

-53.07%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.51%

31.23%

-20.72%

Volatility

CMT vs. ADMA - Volatility Comparison

Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) has a higher volatility of 10.83% compared to ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) at 10.25%. This indicates that CMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMTADMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.83%

10.25%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.46%

45.72%

-12.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.66%

54.23%

-12.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.93%

59.49%

-14.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.34%

69.07%

-7.73%

Dividends

CMT vs. ADMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMT nor ADMA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CMT
Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.41%0.46%

Financials

CMT vs. ADMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core Molding Technologies, Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M20222023202420252026
58.58M
114.49M
(CMT) Total Revenue
(ADMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMT vs. ADMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Core Molding Technologies, Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
20.5%
70.5%
Portfolio components
CMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.98M and revenue of 58.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.5%.

ADMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.75M and revenue of 114.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.

CMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 764.00K and revenue of 58.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

ADMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.27M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

CMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 605.00K and revenue of 58.58M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

ADMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 45.33M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMT and ADMA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMT has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to ADMA (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMT dropped -96.21% vs ADMA's -91.28%.

CMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMT and ADMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer