CMT vs. ATLC
CMT (Core Molding Technologies, Inc.) and ATLC (Atlanticus Holdings Corporation) are both stocks. CMT operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while ATLC operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CMT returned 4.02%/yr vs 43.49%/yr for ATLC. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CMT vs. ATLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMT achieves a 19.70% return, which is significantly lower than ATLC's 61.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CMT has underperformed ATLC with an annualized return of 4.02%, while ATLC has yielded a comparatively higher 43.49% annualized return.
CMT
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 21.64%
- YTD
- 19.70%
- 1Y
- 45.45%
- 3Y*
- 0.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.09%
ATLC
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 105.59%
- YTD
- 61.40%
- 1Y
- 125.03%
- 3Y*
- 41.75%
- 5Y*
- 18.25%
- 10Y*
- 43.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.81M | $16.74M | $14.91M | |
| $647.43K | $582.52K | $684.79K |
CMT vs. ATLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc. | 19.70% | 21.22% | -10.74% | 42.65% | 52.64% | -39.56% | 333.23% | -54.29% | -67.03% | 27.42% |
ATLC Atlanticus Holdings Corporation | 61.40% | 20.03% | 44.25% | 47.60% | -63.26% | 189.57% | 173.36% | 147.53% | 51.67% | -15.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMT and ATLC is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 1999 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, CMT and ATLC have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CMT:
$213.59M
ATLC:
$1.63B
CMT:
$1.66
ATLC:
$10.36
CMT:
14.45
ATLC:
10.43
CMT:
0.51
ATLC:
1.11
CMT:
$270.93M
ATLC:
$1.25B
CMT:
$44.31M
ATLC:
$961.18M
CMT:
$18.05M
ATLC:
$28.39M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMT vs. ATLC — Risk / Return Rank
CMT
ATLC
CMT vs. ATLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (ATLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMT | ATLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 3.40 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 6.57 | -2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMT vs. ATLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMT drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ATLC drawdown of -97.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMT and ATLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMT | ATLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -97.95% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -37.02% | +17.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.95% | -39.45% | -16.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.95% | -74.90% | +18.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.45% | -74.90% | -20.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.06% | -2.13% | -16.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -71.90% | +18.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.75% | 19.10% | -7.35% |
Volatility
CMT vs. ATLC - Volatility Comparison
Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) has a higher volatility of 12.80% compared to Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (ATLC) at 11.73%. This indicates that CMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMT | ATLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.80% | 11.73% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.72% | 39.04% | -7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.43% | 53.40% | -10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.71% | 53.89% | -9.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.30% | 68.77% | -7.47% |
Dividends
CMT vs. ATLC - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMT nor ATLC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATLC Atlanticus Holdings Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 0.46% |
Financials
CMT vs. ATLC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core Molding Technologies, Inc. and Atlanticus Holdings Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMT vs. ATLC - Profitability Comparison
CMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.98M and revenue of 58.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.5%.
ATLC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation reported a gross profit of 650.89M and revenue of 679.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.
CMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 764.00K and revenue of 58.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
ATLC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation reported an operating income of 55.00K and revenue of 679.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 605.00K and revenue of 58.58M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
ATLC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation reported a net income of 41.87M and revenue of 679.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMT and ATLC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMT has higher volatility (12.80%) compared to ATLC (11.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMT dropped -96.21% vs ATLC's -97.95%.
ATLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMT and ATLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer