CMT vs. CCRV

In the year-to-date period, CMT achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than CCRV's -4.88% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is higher than the CCRV Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMT and CCRV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%.

The maximum CMT drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than CCRV's maximum drawdown of -24.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMT and CCRV.

Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) at 4.06%. This indicates that CMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.