PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
CMT vs. CCRV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CMT vs. CCRV

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV).

CCRV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 2020.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CMT or CCRV.

Correlation

The correlation between CMT and CCRV is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CMT vs. CCRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

CMT:

57.78%

CCRV:

17.95%

Max Drawdown

CMT:

-3.99%

CCRV:

-0.88%

Current Drawdown

CMT:

0.00%

CCRV:

0.00%

Returns By Period

CMT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CCRV

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMT vs. CCRV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMT is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMT is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMT is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMT is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMT is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMT is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
CCRV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCRV is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCRV is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCRV is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCRV is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCRV is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCRV is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMT vs. CCRV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

CMT vs. CCRV - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMT nor CCRV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CMT vs. CCRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMT drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, which is greater than CCRV's maximum drawdown of -0.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMT and CCRV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

CMT vs. CCRV - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...