CMT vs. CCRV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CMT (Core Molding Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CMT vs. CCRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CMT

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 16.41%
• 6M: 15.15%
• 1Y: 41.97%
• 3Y*: 4.95%
• 5Y*: 8.59%
• 10Y*: 5.78%

CCRV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMT vs. CCRV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc.	16.41%	21.22%	-10.74%	42.65%	52.64%	-39.56%	85.75%
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	-0.05%	5.74%	5.47%	19.91%	33.78%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CMT and CCRV is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020	0.04

Return for Risk

CMT vs. CCRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMT

CMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
CMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CMT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CMT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CCRV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMT vs. CCRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMT	CCRV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.00	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CMT	CCRV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.28%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.30%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CMT	CCRV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.83%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.66%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.93%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.34%	—	—

Dividends

CMT vs. CCRV - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMT nor CCRV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	7.26%	33.27%	26.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.41%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMT and CCRV in my portfolio?

CMT and CCRV have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.