CMT vs. CCRV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV).

CCRV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 2020.

Performance

CMT vs. CCRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMT vs. CCRV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc.	11.72%	21.22%	-10.74%	42.65%	52.64%	-39.56%	86.43%
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	-0.05%	5.74%	5.47%	19.91%	33.78%	7.37%

Returns By Period

CMT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 13.36%
• YTD: 11.72%
• 6M: 12.34%
• 1Y: 42.86%
• 3Y*: 7.58%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 6.36%

CCRV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CMT vs. CCRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMT

CMT Risk / Return Rank: 74
CMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CMT Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CMT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMT vs. CCRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMT	CCRV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.29	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMT	CCRV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between CMT and CCRV is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CMT vs. CCRV - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMT nor CCRV has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.41%	0.46%
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	7.26%	33.27%	26.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CMT	CCRV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.45%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.52%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CMT	CCRV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.55%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.98%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.54%	—	—