CMT vs. MLM
Compare and contrast key facts about Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM).
Performance
CMT vs. MLM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMT vs. MLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc. | 11.72% | 21.22% | -10.74% | 42.65% | 52.64% | -39.56% | 333.23% | -54.29% | -67.03% | 27.42% |
MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | -5.34% | 21.25% | 4.08% | 48.62% | -22.73% | 56.11% | 2.57% | 64.18% | -21.55% | 0.57% |
Fundamentals
CMT:
$1.94
MLM:
$18.81
CMT:
11.54
MLM:
31.29
CMT:
0.26
MLM:
1.40
CMT:
0.47
MLM:
5.44
CMT:
$273.80M
MLM:
$6.54B
CMT:
$47.58M
MLM:
$1.96B
CMT:
$23.90M
MLM:
$2.19B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMT achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than MLM's -5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CMT has underperformed MLM with an annualized return of 6.36%, while MLM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.62% annualized return.
CMT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 22.74%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 47.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
MLM
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -12.88%
- YTD
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -6.36%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMT vs. MLM — Risk / Return Rank
CMT
MLM
CMT vs. MLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMT | MLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.96 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.42 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.15 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 4.01 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMT | MLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.96 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.48 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.48 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.37 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMT and MLM is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CMT vs. MLM - Dividend Comparison
CMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 0.56% | 0.52% | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.75% | 0.54% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 1.07% | 0.78% | 0.74% | 1.17% |
Drawdowns
CMT vs. MLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMT drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than MLM's maximum drawdown of -63.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMT and MLM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMT | MLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -63.73% | -32.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -20.72% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.95% | -32.75% | -23.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.45% | -48.34% | -47.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.45% | -16.76% | -7.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.52% | -21.49% | -32.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.96% | 5.93% | +3.03% |
Volatility
CMT vs. MLM - Volatility Comparison
Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) has a higher volatility of 18.15% compared to Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) at 8.45%. This indicates that CMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMT | MLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.15% | 8.45% | +9.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.94% | 18.50% | +13.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.55% | 25.00% | +14.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.00% | 26.42% | +19.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.55% | 30.65% | +30.90% |
Financials
CMT vs. MLM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core Molding Technologies, Inc. and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMT vs. MLM - Profitability Comparison
CMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.43M and revenue of 74.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.3%.
MLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 468.00M and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.
CMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.71M and revenue of 74.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
MLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 365.00M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
CMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 3.08M and revenue of 74.68M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.
MLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 279.00M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.