CMT vs. BSVN
CMT (Core Molding Technologies, Inc.) and BSVN (Bank7 Corp.) are both stocks. CMT operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while BSVN operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, CMT returned 10.61%/yr vs 24.45%/yr for BSVN. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CMT vs. BSVN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMT achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly lower than BSVN's 24.29% return.
CMT
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 20.70%
- YTD
- 17.51%
- 1Y
- 42.79%
- 3Y*
- -1.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.04%
BSVN
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- 25.55%
- 5Y*
- 24.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
BSVN Bank7 Corp. | $2.03M | $1.78M | $1.08M |
| $647.52K | $591.34K | $689.10K |
CMT vs. BSVN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc. | 17.51% | 21.22% | -10.74% | 42.65% | 52.64% | -39.56% | 333.23% | -54.29% | -8.26% |
BSVN Bank7 Corp. | 24.29% | -10.03% | 75.30% | 10.03% | 13.72% | 65.72% | -21.39% | 46.53% | -33.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMT and BSVN is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018 | 0.15 |
The correlation between CMT and BSVN shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMT:
$209.68M
BSVN:
$478.63M
CMT:
$1.66
BSVN:
$4.38
CMT:
14.19
BSVN:
11.49
CMT:
0.32
BSVN:
0.62
CMT:
0.50
BSVN:
3.56
CMT:
$270.93M
BSVN:
$135.29M
CMT:
$44.31M
BSVN:
$94.74M
CMT:
$18.05M
BSVN:
$57.26M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMT vs. BSVN — Risk / Return Rank
CMT
BSVN
CMT vs. BSVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) and Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMT | BSVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 0.76 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 1.43 | +2.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMT vs. BSVN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMT drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than BSVN's maximum drawdown of -70.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMT and BSVN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMT | BSVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -70.03% | -26.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -21.72% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.95% | -27.75% | -28.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.95% | -30.81% | -25.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.54% | -2.93% | -17.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -14.69% | -38.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.71% | 11.49% | +0.22% |
Volatility
CMT vs. BSVN - Volatility Comparison
Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) has a higher volatility of 12.69% compared to Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) at 9.47%. This indicates that CMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMT | BSVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.69% | 9.47% | +3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.68% | 19.07% | +12.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.33% | 26.51% | +15.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.69% | 34.90% | +9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.27% | 46.41% | +14.86% |
Dividends
CMT vs. BSVN - Dividend Comparison
CMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVN Bank7 Corp. | 2.15% | 2.49% | 1.93% | 2.71% | 2.03% | 1.96% | 3.59% | 3.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 0.46% |
Financials
CMT vs. BSVN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core Molding Technologies, Inc. and Bank7 Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMT vs. BSVN - Profitability Comparison
CMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.98M and revenue of 58.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.5%.
BSVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank7 Corp. reported a gross profit of 19.94M and revenue of 28.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.
CMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 764.00K and revenue of 58.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
BSVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank7 Corp. reported an operating income of 11.02M and revenue of 28.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.0%.
CMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 605.00K and revenue of 58.58M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
BSVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank7 Corp. reported a net income of 8.35M and revenue of 28.96M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMT and BSVN have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMT has higher volatility (12.69%) compared to BSVN (9.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMT dropped -96.21% vs BSVN's -70.03%.
CMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMT and BSVN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer