CLUB vs. VT
CLUB (Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CLUB is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLUB charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
CLUB vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLUB
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.69%
CLUB vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | -1.40% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLUB and VT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLUB vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
CLUB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VT
CLUB vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLUB | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLUB vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLUB drawdown since its inception was -9.33%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLUB and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLUB | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -50.27% | +40.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | -1.53% | -6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -6.99% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.26% | — |
Volatility
CLUB vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLUB | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 13.63% | +7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 16.21% | +4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 17.16% | +3.87% |
CLUB vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLUB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLUB vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
CLUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLUB and VT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CLUB.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.08% for CLUB.
They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CLUB and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for CLUB and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer