CLUB vs. BCUS

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

CLUB (Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF) and BCUS (Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLUB is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek, while BCUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLUB charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BCUS.

Performance

CLUB vs. BCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLUB

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -1.53%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCUS

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 2.46%
• 6M: 10.07%
• YTD: 11.49%
• 1Y: 13.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLUB vs. BCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF	-1.40%
BCUS Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF	3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CLUB and BCUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

CLUB vs. BCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLUB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCUS

BCUS Risk / Return Rank: 32
BCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLUB vs. BCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLUB	BCUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.91	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.43	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.55	—

Drawdowns

CLUB vs. BCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLUB drawdown since its inception was -9.33%, smaller than the maximum BCUS drawdown of -18.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLUB and BCUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLUB	BCUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.33%	-18.14%	+8.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.60%	-3.68%	-3.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-2.86%	-1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLUB	BCUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.03%	15.48%	+5.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.03%	16.45%	+4.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	16.45%	+4.58%

CLUB vs. BCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLUB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BCUS's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLUB vs. BCUS - Dividend Comparison

CLUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than BCUS's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BCUS Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.27%	0.49%	0.23%
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLUB and BCUS in my portfolio?

CLUB and BCUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLUB or BCUS?

On fees, BCUS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLUB or BCUS?

BCUS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CLUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLUB or BCUS?

BCUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.08% for CLUB.

What is the main difference between CLUB and BCUS?

CLUB is categorized as Global Equities, while BCUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CLUB and 0.70% for BCUS.