CLUB vs. BCUS
CLUB (Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF) and BCUS (Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLUB is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek, while BCUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek. Both are actively managed. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CLUB charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BCUS.
Performance
CLUB vs. BCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLUB
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BCUS
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 9.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $165.96K | $1.50M | $1.07M | |
| $17.53K | $169.88K | $323.26K |
CLUB vs. BCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | -3.85% |
BCUS Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF | 1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLUB and BCUS is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLUB vs. BCUS — Risk / Return Rank
CLUB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCUS
CLUB vs. BCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLUB | BCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLUB vs. BCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLUB drawdown since its inception was -10.40%, smaller than the maximum BCUS drawdown of -18.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLUB and BCUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLUB | BCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -18.14% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -5.00% | -4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -2.87% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.67% | — |
Volatility
CLUB vs. BCUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLUB | BCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.50% | 15.97% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 16.51% | +2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 16.51% | +2.99% |
CLUB vs. BCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLUB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BCUS's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLUB vs. BCUS - Dividend Comparison
CLUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than BCUS's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCUS Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.28% | 0.49% | 0.23% |
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLUB and BCUS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCUS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCUS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CLUB.
BCUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.08% for CLUB.
CLUB is categorized as Global Equities, while BCUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CLUB and 0.70% for BCUS.
Find the right allocation for CLUB and BCUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer