CLUB vs. BCGS
CLUB (Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF) and BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) are both Global Equities funds from Bancreek. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLUB charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BCGS.
Performance
CLUB vs. BCGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLUB
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCGS
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLUB vs. BCGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | -1.40% |
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLUB and BCGS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLUB vs. BCGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLUB vs. BCGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLUB drawdown since its inception was -9.33%, which is greater than BCGS's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLUB and BCGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLUB | BCGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -7.43% | -1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | -2.10% | -5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -2.09% | -2.04% |
Volatility
CLUB vs. BCGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLUB | BCGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 21.94% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 21.94% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 21.94% | -0.91% |
CLUB vs. BCGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLUB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BCGS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLUB vs. BCGS - Dividend Comparison
CLUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than BCGS's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 0.44% |
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLUB and BCGS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLUB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLUB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.
BCGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.08% for CLUB.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CLUB and 0.80% for BCGS.
Find the right allocation for CLUB and BCGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer