CLUB vs. FWD
CLUB (Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLUB charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.
Performance
CLUB vs. FWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLUB
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWD
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- YTD
- 29.25%
- 1Y
- 51.99%
- 3Y*
- 35.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLUB vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | -1.40% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLUB and FWD is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLUB vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank
CLUB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FWD
CLUB vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLUB | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLUB vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLUB drawdown since its inception was -9.33%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLUB and FWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLUB | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -29.02% | +19.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | -9.33% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -4.07% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility
CLUB vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLUB | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 27.83% | -6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 25.69% | -4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 25.69% | -4.66% |
CLUB vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLUB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLUB vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison
CLUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than FWD's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLUB and FWD have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CLUB.
CLUB and FWD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.08%.
They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CLUB and 0.65% for FWD.
Find the right allocation for CLUB and FWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer