CLUB vs. ACWV
CLUB (Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CLUB is actively managed, while ACWV is passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLUB charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.
Performance
CLUB vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLUB
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWV
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
CLUB vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | -1.40% |
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLUB and ACWV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLUB vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank
CLUB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACWV
CLUB vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLUB | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLUB vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLUB drawdown since its inception was -9.33%, smaller than the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLUB and ACWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLUB | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -28.82% | +19.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | -1.16% | -6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -3.11% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.22% | — |
Volatility
CLUB vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLUB | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 8.09% | +12.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 10.28% | +10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 12.29% | +8.74% |
CLUB vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLUB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLUB vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison
CLUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than ACWV's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.93% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLUB and ACWV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CLUB.
ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.08% for CLUB.
They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CLUB and 0.20% for ACWV.
Find the right allocation for CLUB and ACWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer