PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLUB vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLUB vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLUB

1D
-1.36%
1M
-4.04%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
-3.68%
1M
-13.79%
6M
25.01%
YTD
35.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLUB vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CLUB and POW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLUB vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLUB vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLUB vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLUB drawdown since its inception was -9.33%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLUB and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLUBPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-20.28%

+10.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.61%

-20.28%

+12.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-4.56%

+0.06%

Volatility

CLUB vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLUBPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.31%

33.06%

-12.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

33.06%

-12.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

33.06%

-12.75%

CLUB vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLUB and POW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

CLUB vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

CLUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than POW's 0.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLUB and POW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLUB and POW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.08% for CLUB.

CLUB is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and VistaShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLUB and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer