CLUB vs. PID
CLUB (Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CLUB is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CLUB charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
CLUB vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLUB
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PID
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.53K | $169.88K | $323.26K | |
| $1.06M | $1.89M | $1.47M |
CLUB vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | -3.85% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLUB and PID is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLUB vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
CLUB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PID
CLUB vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLUB | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLUB vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLUB drawdown since its inception was -10.40%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLUB and PID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLUB | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -66.34% | +55.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -0.47% | -9.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -12.96% | +7.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.38% | — |
Volatility
CLUB vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLUB | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.50% | 9.73% | +9.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 13.91% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 17.57% | +1.93% |
CLUB vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLUB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLUB vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
CLUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than PID's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLUB and PID have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CLUB.
PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.08% for CLUB.
They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CLUB and 0.56% for PID.
Find the right allocation for CLUB and PID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer