CLUB vs. NZAC

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

CLUB (Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CLUB is actively managed, while NZAC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLUB charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.

Performance

CLUB vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLUB

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -1.53%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NZAC

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 1.58%
• 6M: 5.68%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 1Y: 18.48%
• 3Y*: 17.97%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLUB vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF	-1.40%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CLUB and NZAC is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

CLUB vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLUB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 46
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLUB vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLUB	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.36	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.55	—

Drawdowns

CLUB vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLUB drawdown since its inception was -9.33%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLUB and NZAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLUB	NZAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.33%	-33.72%	+24.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.60%	-2.10%	-5.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-5.30%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLUB	NZAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.58%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.03%	13.68%	+7.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.03%	16.96%	+4.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	17.06%	+3.97%

CLUB vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLUB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLUB vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

CLUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than NZAC's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.06%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLUB and NZAC in my portfolio?

CLUB and NZAC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLUB or NZAC?

On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLUB or NZAC?

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CLUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLUB or NZAC?

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.08% for CLUB.

What is the main difference between CLUB and NZAC?

They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CLUB and 0.12% for NZAC.