CLS vs. VIST
CLS (Celestica Inc.) and VIST (Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V.) are both stocks. CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while VIST operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, CLS returned 106.30%/yr vs 71.42%/yr for VIST. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CLS vs. VIST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly lower than VIST's 44.78% return.
CLS
- 1D
- -6.00%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 65.84%
- 3Y*
- 149.34%
- 5Y*
- 106.30%
- 10Y*
- 40.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.58%
VIST
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- YTD
- 44.78%
- 1Y
- 57.61%
- 3Y*
- 39.75%
- 5Y*
- 71.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 35.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.16B | $852.74M | $822.47M | |
| $67.07M | $65.42M | $69.21M |
CLS vs. VIST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 12.12% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | 18.48% |
VIST Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V. | 44.78% | -10.07% | 83.36% | 88.44% | 193.81% | 108.20% | -67.39% | -4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS and VIST is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CLS and VIST shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLS:
$38.11B
VIST:
$7.35B
CLS:
$9.64
VIST:
$7.61
CLS:
34.38
VIST:
9.26
CLS:
0.46
VIST:
0.07
CLS:
2.46
VIST:
2.21
CLS:
15.53
VIST:
2.42
CLS:
$15.62B
VIST:
$3.53B
CLS:
$1.81B
VIST:
$1.74B
CLS:
$1.50B
VIST:
$2.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLS vs. VIST — Risk / Return Rank
CLS
VIST
CLS vs. VIST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V. (VIST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLS | VIST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.22 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 4.72 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLS vs. VIST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than VIST's maximum drawdown of -81.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and VIST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLS | VIST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.93% | -81.19% | -15.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -26.13% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.96% | -43.36% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.96% | -43.36% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.84% | -11.10% | -18.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.10% | -28.02% | -45.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.47% | 12.25% | +3.22% |
Volatility
CLS vs. VIST - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 25.97% compared to Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V. (VIST) at 12.90%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLS | VIST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.97% | 12.90% | +13.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.62% | 32.64% | +22.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.89% | 49.98% | +24.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.52% | 51.40% | +7.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.65% | 60.79% | -10.14% |
Dividends
CLS vs. VIST - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLS nor VIST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CLS vs. VIST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLS vs. VIST - Profitability Comparison
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 577.50M and revenue of 4.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.
VIST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 708.33M and revenue of 1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.4%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 458.30M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.
VIST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 546.37M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.2%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 368.80M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
VIST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of 332.99M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLS and VIST have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (25.97%) compared to VIST (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLS dropped -96.93% vs VIST's -81.19%.
VIST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLS and VIST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer