PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLS vs. RISR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLS vs. RISR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 32.99% return, which is significantly higher than RISR's 3.07% return.


CLS

1D
1.88%
1M
9.64%
YTD
32.99%
6M
28.26%
1Y
213.67%
3Y*
207.28%
5Y*
116.26%
10Y*
43.71%

RISR

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
3.07%
6M
3.20%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLS vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLS
Celestica Inc.
32.99%220.27%215.23%159.80%1.26%25.34%
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
3.07%4.63%24.20%7.02%31.98%-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and RISR is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

-0.05

The correlation between CLS and RISR shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLS vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RISR
RISR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLSRISRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.15

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.91

1.83

+5.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.83

4.33

+12.50

CLS vs. RISR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the RISR Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and RISR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLS vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than RISR's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and RISR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSRISRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.93%

-14.31%

-82.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.24%

-2.61%

-26.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.96%

-8.07%

-45.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.78%

-0.44%

-16.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.31%

-2.17%

-71.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.98%

1.10%

+10.88%

Volatility

CLS vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 27.54% compared to FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) at 1.30%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSRISRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.54%

1.30%

+26.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.42%

3.98%

+51.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.65%

5.45%

+67.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.70%

11.82%

+45.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.97%

11.82%

+38.15%

Dividends

CLS vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison

CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
5.91%5.95%5.67%7.96%4.26%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLS and RISR have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to RISR (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLS dropped -96.93% vs RISR's -14.31%.

CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLS and RISR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer