CLS.TO vs. URBN
CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) and URBN (Urban Outfitters, Inc.) are both stocks. CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while URBN operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO returned 40.06%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for URBN. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLS.TO vs. URBN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLS.TO is traded in CAD, while URBN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URBN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than URBN's -4.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed URBN with an annualized return of 40.06%, while URBN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.37% annualized return.
CLS.TO
- 1D
- -8.67%
- 1M
- -16.62%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 92.16%
- 3Y*
- 170.29%
- 5Y*
- 115.61%
- 10Y*
- 40.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.52%
URBN
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- -4.33%
- 1Y
- -1.19%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | CA$159.61M | CA$161.91M | CA$209.67M |
| CA$121.73M | CA$120.92M | CA$123.81M |
CLS.TO vs. URBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 5.93% | 206.05% | 241.82% | 154.33% | 8.23% | 37.29% | -4.64% | -9.95% | -9.26% | -17.16% |
URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. | -4.33% | 30.88% | 66.79% | 46.08% | -13.62% | 14.63% | -10.00% | -19.80% | 2.66% | 14.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS.TO and URBN is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2006 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CLS.TO and URBN shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLS.TO:
CA$49.45B
URBN:
$5.99B
CLS.TO:
$8.29
URBN:
$5.18
CLS.TO:
36.89
URBN:
13.50
CLS.TO:
0.50
URBN:
0.58
CLS.TO:
2.56
URBN:
1.01
CLS.TO:
16.85
URBN:
2.38
CLS.TO:
$13.81B
URBN:
$6.32B
CLS.TO:
$1.60B
URBN:
$2.27B
CLS.TO:
$1.36B
URBN:
$603.32M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLS.TO vs. URBN — Risk / Return Rank
CLS.TO
URBN
CLS.TO vs. URBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLS.TO | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.03 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | -0.05 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | -0.09 | +6.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLS.TO vs. URBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.32%, which is greater than URBN's maximum drawdown of -71.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and URBN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLS.TO | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.32% | -71.81% | -7.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.38% | -25.73% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.25% | -28.81% | -25.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.25% | -55.36% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.32% | -71.81% | -7.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.12% | -13.40% | -20.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.95% | -26.12% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.44% | 14.03% | +1.41% |
Volatility
CLS.TO vs. URBN - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) at 10.37%. This indicates that CLS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLS.TO | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.74% | 10.37% | +12.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.70% | 27.34% | +28.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.44% | 44.86% | +29.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.51% | 47.81% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.30% | 49.26% | +0.04% |
Dividends
CLS.TO vs. URBN - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLS.TO nor URBN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CLS.TO vs. URBN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Urban Outfitters, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLS.TO vs. URBN - Profitability Comparison
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
URBN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a gross profit of 542.57M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
URBN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported an operating income of 139.68M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
URBN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a net income of 115.71M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLS.TO and URBN have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CLS.TO and URBN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer