CLS.TO vs. AMZN
CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) and AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) are both stocks. CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while AMZN operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO returned 40.62%/yr vs 21.82%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLS.TO vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLS.TO is traded in CAD, while AMZN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMZN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 10.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 40.62%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively lower 21.82% annualized return.
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -17.81%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 1Y
- 96.49%
- 3Y*
- 172.89%
- 5Y*
- 115.09%
- 10Y*
- 40.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.51%
AMZN
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 26.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- 21.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.90%
CLS.TO vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 6.37% | 206.05% | 241.82% | 154.33% | 8.23% | 37.29% | -4.64% | -9.95% | -9.26% | -17.16% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 10.87% | 0.41% | 56.62% | 76.58% | -46.42% | 2.33% | 72.07% | 17.96% | 39.23% | 45.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS.TO and AMZN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2006 | 0.28 |
The correlation between CLS.TO and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLS.TO:
CA$49.65B
AMZN:
$2.69T
CLS.TO:
$8.29
AMZN:
$8.36
CLS.TO:
37.21
AMZN:
29.90
CLS.TO:
0.50
AMZN:
0.72
CLS.TO:
2.59
AMZN:
3.66
CLS.TO:
17.00
AMZN:
6.15
CLS.TO:
$13.81B
AMZN:
$742.78B
CLS.TO:
$1.60B
AMZN:
$348.59B
CLS.TO:
$1.36B
AMZN:
$152.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLS.TO vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
CLS.TO
AMZN
CLS.TO vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLS.TO | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 0.54 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 1.24 | +5.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLS.TO vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.32%, which is greater than AMZN's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLS.TO | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.32% | -63.03% | -16.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.38% | -24.00% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.25% | -31.53% | -22.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.25% | -52.52% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.32% | -52.52% | -26.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.85% | -7.60% | -26.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.93% | -15.64% | -13.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.00% | 10.38% | +4.62% |
Volatility
CLS.TO vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.18% compared to Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) at 8.73%. This indicates that CLS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLS.TO | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.18% | 8.73% | +10.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.47% | 21.83% | +32.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.73% | 31.20% | +42.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.20% | 36.11% | +21.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.18% | 33.21% | +15.97% |
Dividends
CLS.TO vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLS.TO nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CLS.TO vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLS.TO vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLS.TO and AMZN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CLS.TO and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer