CLS.TO vs. SJ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLS.TO or SJ.TO.
Key characteristics
| CLS.TO | SJ.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 51.84% | 3.52% |
| 1Y Return | 265.80% | 50.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 79.26% | 16.79% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 38.64% | 13.69% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 17.03% | 11.78% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 5.91 | 1.81 |
| Daily Std Dev | 44.96% | 28.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.34% | -100.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -53.96% | -99.99% |
Fundamentals
| CLS.TO | SJ.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$6.68B | CA$4.53B |
| EPS | CA$2.80 | CA$5.62 |
| PE Ratio | 20.01 | 14.23 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$7.96B | CA$3.32B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$640.30M | CA$524.00M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$494.20M | CA$555.00M |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS.TO and SJ.TO is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CLS.TO vs. SJ.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a 51.84% return, which is significantly higher than SJ.TO's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed SJ.TO with an annualized return of 17.03%, while SJ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLS.TO vs. SJ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLS.TO vs. SJ.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SJ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SJ.TO Stella-Jones Inc. | 1.22% | 1.19% | 1.65% | 1.80% | 1.30% | 1.49% | 1.21% | 0.87% | 0.92% | 0.61% | 0.86% | 0.73% |
Drawdowns
CLS.TO vs. SJ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SJ.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and SJ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLS.TO vs. SJ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO) at 3.24%. This indicates that CLS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLS.TO vs. SJ.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Stella-Jones Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities