PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLS.TOTRP.TO
YTD Return51.84%-3.27%
1Y Return265.80%-5.23%
3Y Return (Ann)79.26%0.14%
5Y Return (Ann)38.64%0.51%
10Y Return (Ann)17.03%4.93%
Sharpe Ratio5.91-0.31
Daily Std Dev44.96%18.47%
Max Drawdown-97.34%-60.25%
Current Drawdown-53.96%-24.02%

Fundamentals


CLS.TOTRP.TO
Market CapCA$6.68BCA$50.89B
EPSCA$2.80CA$2.75
PE Ratio20.0117.84
PEG Ratio0.000.76
Revenue (TTM)CA$7.96BCA$15.93B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$640.30MCA$9.61B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$494.20MCA$9.60B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between CLS.TO and TRP.TO is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a 51.84% return, which is significantly higher than TRP.TO's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed TRP.TO with an annualized return of 17.03%, while TRP.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
67.25%
9.29%
CLS.TO
TRP.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Celestica Inc.

TC Energy Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLS.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLS.TO, currently valued at 5.63, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.005.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLS.TO, currently valued at 5.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.005.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLS.TO, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.70
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLS.TO, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.97
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLS.TO, currently valued at 52.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0052.55
TRP.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRP.TO, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRP.TO, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRP.TO, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRP.TO, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRP.TO, currently valued at -0.86, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.86

CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.91, which is higher than the TRP.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CLS.TO and TRP.TO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.63
-0.35
CLS.TO
TRP.TO

Dividends

CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Dividend Comparison

CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLS.TO
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRP.TO
TC Energy Corporation
7.62%7.19%6.67%5.92%6.26%4.34%5.66%4.09%3.73%4.60%3.36%3.79%

Drawdowns

CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than TRP.TO's maximum drawdown of -60.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and TRP.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-49.23%
-30.38%
CLS.TO
TRP.TO

Volatility

CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO) at 5.33%. This indicates that CLS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
13.95%
5.33%
CLS.TO
TRP.TO

Financials

CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and TC Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items