CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLS.TO or TRP.TO.
Key characteristics
CLS.TO | TRP.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 51.84% | -3.27% |
1Y Return | 265.80% | -5.23% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 79.26% | 0.14% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 38.64% | 0.51% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 17.03% | 4.93% |
Sharpe Ratio | 5.91 | -0.31 |
Daily Std Dev | 44.96% | 18.47% |
Max Drawdown | -97.34% | -60.25% |
Current Drawdown | -53.96% | -24.02% |
Fundamentals
CLS.TO | TRP.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$6.68B | CA$50.89B |
EPS | CA$2.80 | CA$2.75 |
PE Ratio | 20.01 | 17.84 |
PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.76 |
Revenue (TTM) | CA$7.96B | CA$15.93B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$640.30M | CA$9.61B |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$494.20M | CA$9.60B |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS.TO and TRP.TO is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a 51.84% return, which is significantly higher than TRP.TO's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed TRP.TO with an annualized return of 17.03%, while TRP.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TC Energy Corporation | 7.62% | 7.19% | 6.67% | 5.92% | 6.26% | 4.34% | 5.66% | 4.09% | 3.73% | 4.60% | 3.36% | 3.79% |
Drawdowns
CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than TRP.TO's maximum drawdown of -60.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and TRP.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO) at 5.33%. This indicates that CLS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLS.TO vs. TRP.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and TC Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities