CLS.TO vs. CLS
Compare and contrast key facts about Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLS.TO or CLS.
Correlation
The correlation between CLS.TO and CLS is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CLS.TO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CLS.TO:
1.43
CLS:
1.37
CLS.TO:
1.92
CLS:
1.88
CLS.TO:
1.28
CLS:
1.27
CLS.TO:
1.90
CLS:
1.90
CLS.TO:
5.12
CLS:
4.95
CLS.TO:
20.93%
CLS:
20.74%
CLS.TO:
74.72%
CLS:
75.10%
CLS.TO:
-97.34%
CLS:
-96.93%
CLS.TO:
-39.93%
CLS:
-37.91%
Fundamentals
CLS.TO:
CA$13.85B
CLS:
$10.26B
CLS.TO:
CA$4.95
CLS:
$3.58
CLS.TO:
23.76
CLS:
24.92
CLS.TO:
0.00
CLS:
19.42
CLS.TO:
1.37
CLS:
0.99
CLS.TO:
6.43
CLS:
6.30
CLS.TO:
CA$10.09B
CLS:
$10.09B
CLS.TO:
CA$1.08B
CLS:
$1.07B
CLS.TO:
CA$377.00M
CLS:
$688.86M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a -6.90% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's -3.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed CLS with an annualized return of 23.32%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively lower 21.61% annualized return.
CLS.TO
-6.90%
9.22%
29.63%
106.40%
71.19%
23.32%
CLS
-3.35%
12.84%
30.42%
105.41%
71.64%
21.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLS.TO vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CLS.TO
CLS
CLS.TO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLS.TO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLS.TO nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CLS.TO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLS.TO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS) have volatilities of 31.60% and 30.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLS.TO vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities