PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOU vs. SIXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOU vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly lower than SIXH's 10.10% return.


CLOU

1D
0.42%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
-4.95%
6M
-5.99%
1Y
-5.37%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-5.18%
10Y*

SIXH

1D
0.45%
1M
1.32%
YTD
10.10%
6M
10.25%
1Y
13.45%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOU vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF
-4.95%-5.59%5.74%41.36%-39.56%-3.27%49.12%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
10.10%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and SIXH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.19

The correlation between CLOU and SIXH shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOU vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOU
CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOU vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLOUSIXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.31

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

3.09

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

7.85

-8.31

CLOU vs. SIXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOU Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the SIXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOU and SIXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and SIXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOUSIXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-11.68%

-42.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.24%

-4.36%

-22.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.18%

-9.10%

-24.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.74%

-11.68%

-42.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.93%

-0.02%

-31.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.43%

-1.84%

-22.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.46%

1.72%

+9.74%

Volatility

CLOU vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.29%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOUSIXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.72%

2.29%

+11.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.33%

6.08%

+19.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.89%

7.67%

+22.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.65%

10.37%

+20.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.76%

10.12%

+20.64%

CLOU vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOU vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison

CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.76%0.00%0.05%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.85%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOU and SIXH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLOU has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to SIXH (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs SIXH's -11.68%.

On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 9.64% vs -5.18% for CLOU. On fees, CLOU is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 9.64% return vs -5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLOU is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.

CLOU is categorized as Technology Equities, while SIXH is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOU and SIXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer