CLOU vs. PAVE
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOU is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned 0.30%/yr vs 17.29%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
CLOU vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.04% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 11.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 19.04%
- 6M
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 38.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.29%
- 10Y*
- —
CLOU vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 13.35% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -3.27% | 77.18% | 4.79% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.04% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 9.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and PAVE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CLOU and PAVE has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CLOU vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLOU
PAVE
Technology
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CLOU
PAVE
Real Estate
CLOU
PAVE
-
Communication Services
CLOU
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
CLOU
PAVE
-
Healthcare
CLOU
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
CLOU
-
PAVE
Consumer Defensive
CLOU
-
PAVE
Energy
CLOU
-
PAVE
Financial Services
CLOU
-
PAVE
-
Industrials
CLOU
-
PAVE
Utilities
CLOU
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
PAVE
CLOU vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLOU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 2.04 | -1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 2.88 | -2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.34 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 3.22 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 11.84 | -10.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLOU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 2.04 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.80 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.68 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -44.08% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -11.91% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -26.23% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -26.23% | -27.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.82% | -2.50% | -16.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -6.24% | -18.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.01% | 3.24% | +7.77% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.46%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 6.46% | +6.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.52% | 15.22% | +9.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.26% | 18.84% | +10.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.53% | 21.60% | +8.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 24.39% | +6.38% |
CLOU vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOU vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOU and PAVE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLOU has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to PAVE (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.29% vs 0.30% for CLOU. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.29% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.
CLOU is categorized as Technology Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer