CLMB vs. TT
CLMB (Climb Global Solutions) and TT (Trane Technologies plc) are both stocks. CLMB operates in Electronics & Computer Distribution (Technology), while TT operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CLMB returned 20.89%/yr vs 23.62%/yr for TT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLMB vs. TT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a -7.50% return, which is significantly lower than TT's 18.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMB has underperformed TT with an annualized return of 20.89%, while TT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.62% annualized return.
CLMB
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 18.14%
- YTD
- -7.50%
- 6M
- -14.10%
- 1Y
- -9.53%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 20.89%
TT
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 18.47%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 7.99%
- 3Y*
- 39.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.82%
- 10Y*
- 23.62%
CLMB vs. TT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | -7.50% | -18.40% | 133.60% | 76.59% | -8.29% | 88.47% | 22.14% | 70.90% | -37.08% | -7.01% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 18.47% | 6.38% | 52.97% | 47.39% | -15.34% | 41.02% | 11.26% | 48.32% | 4.41% | 21.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLMB and TT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1995 | 0.10 |
The correlation between CLMB and TT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLMB:
$432.99M
TT:
$102.39B
CLMB:
$1.16
TT:
$12.94
CLMB:
20.57
TT:
35.48
CLMB:
0.87
TT:
1.62
CLMB:
0.62
TT:
4.76
CLMB:
3.66
TT:
11.89
CLMB:
$696.85M
TT:
$21.60B
CLMB:
$108.37M
TT:
$7.76B
CLMB:
$35.93M
TT:
$4.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLMB vs. TT — Risk / Return Rank
CLMB
TT
CLMB vs. TT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLMB | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.08 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.40 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 0.79 | -1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLMB | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 0.30 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.80 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.84 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.47 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
CLMB vs. TT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, which is greater than TT's maximum drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and TT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLMB | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.12% | -77.91% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.40% | -19.97% | -33.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.40% | -24.44% | -28.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.40% | -40.53% | -12.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.40% | -51.13% | -2.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.59% | -6.61% | -26.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.23% | -14.84% | -17.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.81% | 10.09% | +15.72% |
Volatility
CLMB vs. TT - Volatility Comparison
Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to Trane Technologies plc (TT) at 7.45%. This indicates that CLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLMB | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.32% | 7.45% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.72% | 21.06% | +19.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.14% | 26.97% | +25.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.76% | 27.28% | +18.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.89% | 28.30% | +12.59% |
Dividends
CLMB vs. TT - Dividend Comparison
CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than TT's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.36% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 0.87% | 0.97% | 0.91% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% |
Financials
CLMB vs. TT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Climb Global Solutions and Trane Technologies plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLMB vs. TT - Profitability Comparison
CLMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 26.50M and revenue of 182.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.
TT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
CLMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 3.88M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
TT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
CLMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 3.33M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
TT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLMB and TT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLMB has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to TT (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLMB dropped -89.12% vs TT's -77.91%.
TT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLMB and TT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer