TT vs. CW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).

Performance

TT vs. CW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TT vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TT Trane Technologies plc	7.33%	6.38%	52.97%	47.39%	-15.34%	41.02%	11.26%	48.32%	4.41%	21.27%
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation	23.60%	55.66%	59.73%	33.98%	21.03%	19.86%	-16.83%	38.70%	-15.79%	24.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TT : $93.18B CW : $25.32B
EPS TT : $13.01 CW : $12.88
PE Ratio TT : 32.04 CW : 52.90
PEG Ratio TT : 1.46 CW : 2.89
PS Ratio TT : 4.39 CW : 7.32
PB Ratio TT : 10.83 CW : 9.99
Total Revenue (TTM) TT : $21.32B CW : $3.50B
Gross Profit (TTM) TT : $7.71B CW : $1.30B
EBITDA (TTM) TT : $4.21B CW : $749.24M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TT achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 23.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TT has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 22.93%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 25.22% annualized return.

TT

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -9.64%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: -0.77%
• 1Y: 24.83%
• 3Y*: 32.81%
• 5Y*: 21.85%
• 10Y*: 22.93%

CW

• 1D: 7.76%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: 23.60%
• 6M: 25.55%
• 1Y: 115.06%
• 3Y*: 57.36%
• 5Y*: 42.06%
• 10Y*: 25.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TT vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TT

TT Risk / Return Rank: 68
TT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TT Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TT Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
TT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

CW

CW Risk / Return Rank: 97
CW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CW Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TT vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TT	CW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	3.33	-2.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	3.64	-2.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.51	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	8.83	-7.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.69	25.72	-23.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TT vs. CW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TT Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the CW Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TT and CW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TT	CW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	3.33	-2.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	1.53	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.84	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.59	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between TT and CW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TT vs. CW - Dividend Comparison

TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than CW's 0.14% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TT Trane Technologies plc	0.93%	0.97%	0.91%	1.23%	1.59%	1.17%	1.46%	1.59%	2.15%	1.91%	1.81%	2.10%
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation	0.14%	0.17%	0.23%	0.35%	0.45%	0.51%	0.58%	0.47%	0.59%	0.46%	0.53%	0.76%

Drawdowns

TT vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.91%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and CW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TT	CW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.91%	-59.19%	-18.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.97%	-13.07%	-6.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.53%	-27.21%	-13.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.13%	-48.73%	-2.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.60%	-6.21%	-5.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.88%	-13.95%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.92%	4.49%	+5.43%

Volatility

TT vs. CW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trane Technologies plc (TT) is 10.97%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 15.01%. This indicates that TT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TT	CW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.97%	15.01%	-4.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.33%	26.50%	-6.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.46%	34.79%	-5.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.00%	27.60%	-0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.14%	30.15%	-2.01%

Financials

TT vs. CW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trane Technologies plc and Curtiss-Wright Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 5.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.

CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 355.44M and revenue of 946.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.5%.

TT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 819.00M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 186.26M and revenue of 946.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.

TT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 591.30M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 137.00M and revenue of 946.98M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.