TT vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TT or CW.
Key characteristics
TT | CW | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 35.73% | 23.30% |
1Y Return | 87.99% | 67.26% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 23.38% | 29.70% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 30.57% | 19.16% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 24.39% | 16.07% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.56 | 3.87 |
Daily Std Dev | 24.87% | 17.75% |
Max Drawdown | -77.92% | -59.19% |
Current Drawdown | -0.86% | -1.03% |
Fundamentals
TT | CW | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $75.14B | $10.62B |
EPS | $9.46 | $9.71 |
PE Ratio | 35.09 | 28.56 |
PEG Ratio | 2.78 | 2.71 |
Revenue (TTM) | $18.23B | $2.93B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.96B | $954.61M |
EBITDA (TTM) | $3.33B | $648.86M |
Correlation
The correlation between TT and CW is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TT vs. CW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TT achieves a 35.73% return, which is significantly higher than CW's 23.30% return. Over the past 10 years, TT has outperformed CW with an annualized return of 24.39%, while CW has yielded a comparatively lower 16.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TT vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TT vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than CW's 0.29% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trane Technologies plc | 0.94% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.58% | 1.09% |
Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
TT vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.92%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TT vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
Trane Technologies plc (TT) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 4.82%. This indicates that TT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TT vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trane Technologies plc and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities