TT vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TT or CW.
Performance
TT vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TT achieves a 69.94% return, which is significantly higher than CW's 62.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TT has outperformed CW with an annualized return of 25.89%, while CW has yielded a comparatively lower 18.46% annualized return.
TT
69.94%
2.58%
23.90%
84.00%
34.62%
25.89%
CW
62.60%
-0.78%
28.93%
70.69%
22.19%
18.46%
Fundamentals
| TT | CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $92.94B | $13.73B |
| EPS | $10.85 | $10.55 |
| PE Ratio | 37.89 | 34.26 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.94 | 2.71 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $19.39B | $3.08B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $6.84B | $1.14B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.73B | $680.05M |
Key characteristics
| TT | CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.65 | 3.19 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.45 | 3.98 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.59 | 1.57 |
| Calmar Ratio | 8.98 | 7.12 |
| Martin Ratio | 31.98 | 26.40 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.60% | 2.70% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.84% | 22.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -77.92% | -59.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.93% | -7.20% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between TT and CW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TT vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TT vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than CW's 0.17% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TT Trane Technologies plc | 0.80% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.58% | 1.09% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.17% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
TT vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.92%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TT vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trane Technologies plc (TT) is 7.48%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that TT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TT vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trane Technologies plc and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities