TT vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TT or CW.
Correlation
The correlation between TT and CW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TT vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TT:
0.25
CW:
0.33
TT:
0.50
CW:
0.62
TT:
1.06
CW:
1.09
TT:
0.28
CW:
0.38
TT:
0.82
CW:
1.27
TT:
8.05%
CW:
8.16%
TT:
26.04%
CW:
31.05%
TT:
-77.92%
CW:
-59.19%
TT:
-23.74%
CW:
-27.21%
Fundamentals
TT:
$71.35B
CW:
$10.67B
TT:
$11.35
CW:
$10.56
TT:
28.03
CW:
26.82
TT:
2.59
CW:
2.71
TT:
$15.62B
CW:
$2.41B
TT:
$5.62B
CW:
$899.79M
TT:
$3.15B
CW:
$538.04M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TT achieves a -13.64% return, which is significantly higher than CW's -20.15% return. Over the past 10 years, TT has outperformed CW with an annualized return of 21.92%, while CW has yielded a comparatively lower 14.79% annualized return.
TT
-13.64%
-8.51%
-17.70%
7.99%
33.81%
21.92%
CW
-20.15%
-12.51%
-15.99%
11.10%
28.29%
14.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TT vs. CW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TT
CW
TT vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TT vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than CW's 0.30% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TT Trane Technologies plc | 1.09% | 0.91% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.58% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.30% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
TT vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.92%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TT vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trane Technologies plc (TT) is 10.94%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that TT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TT vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trane Technologies plc and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities