PortfoliosLab logo
TT vs. CW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TT and CW is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TT vs. CW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TT:

0.99

CW:

1.44

Sortino Ratio

TT:

1.54

CW:

1.94

Omega Ratio

TT:

1.20

CW:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

TT:

1.25

CW:

1.82

Martin Ratio

TT:

3.25

CW:

5.27

Ulcer Index

TT:

9.41%

CW:

9.40%

Daily Std Dev

TT:

28.94%

CW:

33.20%

Max Drawdown

TT:

-77.92%

CW:

-59.19%

Current Drawdown

TT:

0.00%

CW:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TT:

$94.08B

CW:

$15.14B

EPS

TT:

$12.09

CW:

$11.41

PE Ratio

TT:

34.71

CW:

35.22

PEG Ratio

TT:

3.24

CW:

2.71

PS Ratio

TT:

4.63

CW:

4.71

PB Ratio

TT:

12.56

CW:

5.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

TT:

$20.31B

CW:

$3.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TT:

$7.30B

CW:

$1.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

TT:

$4.06B

CW:

$704.10M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TT having a 14.66% return and CW slightly higher at 14.79%. Over the past 10 years, TT has outperformed CW with an annualized return of 24.87%, while CW has yielded a comparatively lower 19.38% annualized return.


TT

YTD

14.66%

1M

22.79%

6M

3.48%

1Y

28.36%

5Y*

42.69%

10Y*

24.87%

CW

YTD

14.79%

1M

26.89%

6M

12.83%

1Y

47.36%

5Y*

37.29%

10Y*

19.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TT vs. CW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TT is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TT is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TT is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TT is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TT is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TT is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CW is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CW is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CW is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CW is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CW is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CW is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TT vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TT Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the CW Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TT and CW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

TT vs. CW - Dividend Comparison

TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than CW's 0.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TT
Trane Technologies plc
0.82%0.91%1.23%1.59%1.17%1.46%1.59%2.15%1.91%1.81%2.10%1.58%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.21%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%0.74%

Drawdowns

TT vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.92%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TT vs. CW - Volatility Comparison

Trane Technologies plc (TT) has a higher volatility of 10.85% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 5.34%. This indicates that TT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TT vs. CW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trane Technologies plc and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
4.69B
805.65M
(TT) Total Revenue
(CW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TT vs. CW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trane Technologies plc and Curtiss-Wright Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
35.8%
36.3%
(TT) Gross Margin
(CW) Gross Margin
TT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 4.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 292.46M and revenue of 805.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

TT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 818.90M and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 129.21M and revenue of 805.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

TT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 604.90M and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 101.34M and revenue of 805.65M, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.