TT vs. J
TT (Trane Technologies plc) and J (Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — TT in Specialty Industrial Machinery, J in Engineering & Construction. Over the past 10 years, TT returned 23.16%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for J. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TT vs. J - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TT achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly higher than J's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, TT has outperformed J with an annualized return of 23.16%, while J has yielded a comparatively lower 12.95% annualized return.
TT
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 33.11%
- 5Y*
- 18.95%
- 10Y*
- 23.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.31%
J
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- -1.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $108.51M | $112.80M | $159.36M | |
| $661.27M | $596.12M | $648.95M |
TT vs. J - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TT Trane Technologies plc | 17.44% | 6.38% | 52.97% | 47.39% | -15.34% | 41.02% | 11.26% | 48.32% | 4.41% | 21.27% |
J Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | 2.45% | 2.13% | 24.23% | 9.02% | -13.12% | 28.60% | 22.36% | 54.99% | -10.58% | 16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TT and J is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 1990 | 0.41 |
The correlation between TT and J shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.50 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TT:
$100.57B
J:
$15.93B
TT:
$13.19
J:
$3.19
TT:
34.49
J:
42.26
TT:
1.58
J:
7.60
TT:
4.58
J:
0.82
TT:
$22.21B
J:
$13.17B
TT:
$7.86B
J:
$3.08B
TT:
$4.23B
J:
$845.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TT vs. J — Risk / Return Rank
TT
J
TT vs. J - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TT | J | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.01 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | -0.11 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | -0.23 | +0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TT vs. J - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.91%, which is greater than J's maximum drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and J.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TT | J | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.91% | -74.14% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.90% | -34.44% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.44% | -34.44% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.76% | -34.44% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.13% | -39.33% | -11.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.64% | -17.27% | +7.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -26.15% | +11.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.30% | 17.35% | -10.05% |
Volatility
TT vs. J - Volatility Comparison
Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) have volatilities of 8.26% and 8.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TT | J | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.26% | 8.43% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.52% | 26.57% | -4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.20% | 32.78% | -4.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 26.29% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.40% | 27.83% | +0.57% |
Dividends
TT vs. J - Dividend Comparison
TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than J's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | 1.01% | 1.96% | 0.76% | 0.80% | 0.77% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.76% | 1.03% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 0.87% | 0.97% | 0.91% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% |
Financials
TT vs. J - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trane Technologies plc and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TT vs. J - Profitability Comparison
TT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 2.26B and revenue of 6.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.
J - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.89M and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.
TT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 6.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.3%.
J - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported an operating income of -81.18M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
TT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 925.70M and revenue of 6.35B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
J - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a net income of -175.69M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TT and J have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
J has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to TT (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TT dropped -77.91% vs J's -74.14%.
TT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TT and J
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer