CLIM vs. USRT
CLIM (Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF) and USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - CLIM tracks the Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX) while USRT tracks the FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CLIM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for USRT.
Performance
CLIM vs. USRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLIM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
USRT
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- 6M
- 20.59%
- YTD
- 23.09%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.25K | $5.06K | $6.36K | |
| $26.24M | $42.40M | $34.64M |
CLIM vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 13.70% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 14.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIM and USRT is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIM vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank
CLIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USRT
CLIM vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF (CLIM) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIM | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIM vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIM drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, smaller than the maximum USRT drawdown of -69.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM and USRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIM | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -69.92% | +63.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.49% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -12.89% | +11.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.45% | — |
Volatility
CLIM vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIM | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 14.10% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 18.93% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 21.34% | -5.44% |
CLIM vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIM vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison
CLIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than USRT's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.45% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CLIM and USRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CLIM.
USRT has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.12% for CLIM.
CLIM tracks Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX), while USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Climate Global and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CLIM and 0.08% for USRT.
Find the right allocation for CLIM and USRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer