USRT vs. ICF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF).
USRT and ICF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USRT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index. It was launched on May 4, 2007. ICF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001. Both USRT and ICF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USRT or ICF.
Correlation
The correlation between USRT and ICF is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
USRT vs. ICF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
USRT:
0.74
ICF:
0.82
USRT:
1.11
ICF:
1.20
USRT:
1.15
ICF:
1.16
USRT:
0.66
ICF:
0.57
USRT:
2.57
ICF:
2.68
USRT:
5.30%
ICF:
5.50%
USRT:
18.48%
ICF:
18.07%
USRT:
-69.89%
ICF:
-76.73%
USRT:
-10.59%
ICF:
-14.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly lower than ICF's -0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, USRT has outperformed ICF with an annualized return of 5.17%, while ICF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.89% annualized return.
USRT
-2.92%
-2.82%
-8.50%
12.55%
10.05%
5.17%
ICF
-0.58%
-1.62%
-7.80%
13.65%
7.10%
4.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USRT vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison
USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USRT vs. ICF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
USRT
ICF
USRT vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USRT vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison
USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than ICF's 2.68% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.90% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% | 3.46% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.68% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.32% | 3.30% | 3.00% |
Drawdowns
USRT vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.89%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and ICF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USRT vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) at 9.97%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.