USRT vs. ICF
USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) and ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) are both REIT funds from iShares - USRT tracks the FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index while ICF tracks the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USRT returned 6.39%/yr vs 5.61%/yr for ICF. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USRT charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ICF.
Performance
USRT vs. ICF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly higher than ICF's 14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, USRT has outperformed ICF with an annualized return of 6.39%, while ICF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.61% annualized return.
USRT
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 6M
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 18.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
ICF
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- 1Y
- 13.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
USRT vs. ICF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 15.99% | 2.44% | 8.58% | 13.64% | -24.43% | 43.26% | -8.06% | 25.98% | -4.67% | 5.27% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 14.47% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between USRT and ICF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007 | 0.92 |
The correlation between USRT and ICF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USRT vs. ICF — Risk / Return Rank
USRT
ICF
USRT vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USRT | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.62 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | 4.58 | +2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USRT vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and ICF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USRT | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.92% | -76.74% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -8.20% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -17.25% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.03% | -34.74% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.38% | -40.22% | -4.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -2.11% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -14.15% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.90% | -0.40% |
Volatility
USRT vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) have volatilities of 5.04% and 4.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USRT | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.94% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 10.61% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 14.20% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 18.96% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 20.63% | +0.70% |
USRT vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison
USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
USRT vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison
USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than ICF's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.45% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.60% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, USRT and ICF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USRT has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to ICF (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs ICF's -76.74%.
On 10-year performance, USRT leads with 6.39% vs 5.61% for ICF. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USRT has performed better with a 6.39% return vs 5.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.
USRT has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.45% for ICF.
USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index, while ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.34% for ICF.
USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USRT and ICF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer