SRET vs. NETL
SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) and NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index while NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRET returned 1.69%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for NETL. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRET charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NETL.
Performance
SRET vs. NETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRET achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than NETL's 12.00% return.
SRET
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.69%
- 10Y*
- 1.07%
NETL
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 6M
- 12.28%
- 1Y
- 11.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- —
SRET vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 5.39% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 10.34% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 12.00% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 12.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRET and NETL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SRET and NETL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRET vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank
SRET
NETL
SRET vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRET | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.27 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 3.94 | +2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRET vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRET drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRET and NETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRET | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.98% | -51.48% | -15.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -9.16% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.87% | -19.30% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -30.74% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.02% | -3.47% | -19.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.48% | -11.58% | -10.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.94% | -0.64% |
Volatility
SRET vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is 3.72%, while NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that SRET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRET | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 4.96% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 10.31% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.54% | 14.07% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 17.98% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 25.87% | -1.27% |
SRET vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRET has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRET vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison
SRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, more than NETL's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.76% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.99% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRET and NETL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NETL has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to SRET (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRET dropped -66.98% vs NETL's -51.48%.
On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 1.88% vs 1.69% for SRET. On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 1.88% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.99%, compared with 4.76% for NETL.
SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SRET and 0.60% for NETL.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRET and NETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer