CLIM vs. PFFR
CLIM (Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF) and PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) are both REIT funds - CLIM tracks the Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX) while PFFR tracks the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CLIM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFFR.
Performance
CLIM vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLIM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PFFR
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.25K | $5.06K | $6.36K | |
| $766.09K | $612.42K | $587.91K |
CLIM vs. PFFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 13.70% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIM and PFFR is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIM vs. PFFR — Risk / Return Rank
CLIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PFFR
CLIM vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF (CLIM) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIM | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIM vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIM drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, smaller than the maximum PFFR drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM and PFFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIM | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -53.02% | +46.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.70% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -6.92% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility
CLIM vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIM | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 8.12% | +7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 10.54% | +5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 20.40% | -4.50% |
CLIM vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIM vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison
CLIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than PFFR's 8.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.32% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLIM and PFFR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFFR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFFR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CLIM.
PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 1.12% for CLIM.
CLIM tracks Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX), while PFFR tracks Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: Climate Global and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CLIM and 0.45% for PFFR.
Find the right allocation for CLIM and PFFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer