CLF vs. CAG
CLF (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.) and CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. CLF operates in Steel (Basic Materials), while CAG operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, CLF returned 11.73%/yr vs -5.70%/yr for CAG. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLF vs. CAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly higher than CAG's -17.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF has outperformed CAG with an annualized return of 11.73%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively lower -5.70% annualized return.
CLF
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 25.39%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 91.92%
- 3Y*
- -6.24%
- 5Y*
- -10.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
CAG
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -17.02%
- 6M
- -19.07%
- 1Y
- -32.99%
- 3Y*
- -21.83%
- 5Y*
- -13.84%
- 10Y*
- -5.70%
CLF vs. CAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 3.77% | 41.28% | -53.97% | 26.75% | -26.00% | 49.52% | 77.38% | 12.72% | 6.66% | -14.27% |
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -17.02% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLF and CAG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.14 |
The correlation between CLF and CAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLF:
$7.78B
CAG:
$6.58B
CLF:
-$2.37
CAG:
-$0.09
CLF:
0.37
CAG:
0.59
CLF:
1.34
CAG:
0.81
CLF:
$18.90B
CAG:
$11.18B
CLF:
-$528.00M
CAG:
$2.70B
CLF:
$134.00M
CAG:
$792.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLF vs. CAG — Risk / Return Rank
CLF
CAG
CLF vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLF | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.81 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | -0.90 | +2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | -1.81 | +5.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLF vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than CAG's maximum drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and CAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLF | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.78% | -62.52% | -36.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.67% | -36.75% | -14.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.46% | -56.85% | -17.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.37% | -62.52% | -19.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.37% | -62.52% | -19.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.95% | -59.06% | -26.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.62% | -15.76% | -31.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.06% | 20.37% | +4.69% |
Volatility
CLF vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a higher volatility of 22.19% compared to Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) at 8.53%. This indicates that CLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLF | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.19% | 8.53% | +13.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.32% | 22.11% | +25.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.48% | 28.21% | +40.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.28% | 23.36% | +35.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.12% | 26.20% | +35.92% |
Dividends
CLF vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison
CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 10.19% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CLF vs. CAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and Conagra Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLF vs. CAG - Profitability Comparison
CLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a gross profit of -82.00M and revenue of 4.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.7%.
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.70M and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
CLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported an operating income of -207.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.2%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 280.10M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.
CLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a net income of -237.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 199.80M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLF and CAG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLF has higher volatility (22.19%) compared to CAG (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLF dropped -98.78% vs CAG's -62.52%.
CLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLF and CAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer