CLDT vs. BXMT
CLDT (Chatham Lodging Trust) and BXMT (Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CLDT in REIT - Hotel & Motel, BXMT in REIT - Mortgage. Over the past 10 years, CLDT returned -1.93%/yr vs 2.56%/yr for BXMT. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CLDT vs. BXMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a 99.77% return, which is significantly higher than BXMT's -19.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDT has underperformed BXMT with an annualized return of -1.93%, while BXMT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.56% annualized return.
CLDT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 91.34%
- YTD
- 99.77%
- 1Y
- 110.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- -1.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.64%
BXMT
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -15.71%
- 6M
- -20.43%
- YTD
- -19.93%
- 1Y
- -13.66%
- 3Y*
- -3.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $34.63M | $30.38M | $28.02M | |
| $4.75M | $4.35M | $5.22M |
CLDT vs. BXMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 99.77% | -19.89% | -13.83% | -10.13% | -10.05% | 27.04% | -40.30% | 11.32% | -17.05% | 18.06% |
BXMT Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. | -19.93% | 21.13% | -7.90% | 13.46% | -24.03% | 20.27% | -17.83% | 25.16% | 6.95% | 15.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLDT and BXMT is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2010 | 0.41 |
The correlation between CLDT and BXMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLDT:
$622.26M
BXMT:
$2.45B
CLDT:
$0.19
BXMT:
$0.09
CLDT:
71.25
BXMT:
160.30
CLDT:
2.21
BXMT:
1.90
CLDT:
0.87
BXMT:
0.75
CLDT:
$293.94M
BXMT:
$1.30B
CLDT:
-$10.45M
BXMT:
$648.75M
CLDT:
$80.74M
BXMT:
$837.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLDT vs. BXMT — Risk / Return Rank
CLDT
BXMT
CLDT vs. BXMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLDT | BXMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 0.92 | +0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.62 | -0.50 | +6.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.04 | -1.80 | +14.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLDT vs. BXMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, smaller than the maximum BXMT drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and BXMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLDT | BXMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.52% | -97.98% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.75% | -26.10% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.89% | -26.10% | -15.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.84% | -43.02% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.52% | -67.86% | -13.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.97% | -46.25% | +13.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.36% | -49.01% | +15.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.07% | 7.17% | +0.90% |
Volatility
CLDT vs. BXMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) is 6.95%, while Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT) has a volatility of 10.82%. This indicates that CLDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLDT | BXMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 10.82% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.34% | 19.43% | +4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.75% | 23.80% | +6.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 27.99% | +4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 32.79% | +10.36% |
Dividends
CLDT vs. BXMT - Dividend Comparison
CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than BXMT's 12.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXMT Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. | 12.93% | 9.83% | 12.52% | 11.66% | 11.71% | 8.10% | 9.01% | 6.66% | 7.78% | 7.71% | 8.25% | 8.52% |
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 2.85% | 5.29% | 3.13% | 2.61% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 5.80% | 6.72% | 5.86% |
Financials
CLDT vs. BXMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chatham Lodging Trust and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLDT vs. BXMT - Profitability Comparison
CLDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 67.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BXMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 158.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 1.64M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.
BXMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 158.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CLDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a net income of -4.42M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.5%.
BXMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -81.22M and revenue of 158.06M, resulting in a net margin of -51.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLDT and BXMT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXMT has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to CLDT (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLDT dropped -83.52% vs BXMT's -97.98%.
CLDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLDT and BXMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer