PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLDT vs. BXMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLDT vs. BXMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a 63.32% return, which is significantly higher than BXMT's -3.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDT has underperformed BXMT with an annualized return of -3.11%, while BXMT has yielded a comparatively higher 4.80% annualized return.


CLDT

1D
-0.81%
1M
28.12%
YTD
63.32%
6M
66.94%
1Y
61.28%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
-1.57%
10Y*
-3.11%

BXMT

1D
-1.64%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
-3.50%
6M
-4.30%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
9.52%
5Y*
-1.60%
10Y*
4.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLDT vs. BXMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
63.32%-19.89%-13.83%-10.13%-10.05%27.04%-40.30%11.32%-17.05%18.06%
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
-3.50%21.13%-7.90%13.46%-24.03%20.27%-17.83%25.16%6.95%15.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CLDT and BXMT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2010

0.41

The correlation between CLDT and BXMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLDT:

$518.82M

BXMT:

$3.05B

EPS

CLDT:

$0.19

BXMT:

$0.61

PE Ratio

CLDT:

58.97

BXMT:

29.71

PS Ratio

CLDT:

1.83

BXMT:

2.00

PB Ratio

CLDT:

0.72

BXMT:

0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLDT:

$293.94M

BXMT:

$1.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLDT:

-$10.45M

BXMT:

$960.53M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLDT:

$80.74M

BXMT:

$957.49M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLDT vs. BXMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLDT
CLDT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CLDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CLDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BXMT
BXMT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BXMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BXMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLDT vs. BXMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLDTBXMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

0.27

+1.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

0.52

+2.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.06

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

0.48

+2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.45

1.15

+6.30

CLDT vs. BXMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the BXMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDT and BXMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLDTBXMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

0.27

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.06

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.15

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.08

-0.07

Drawdowns

CLDT vs. BXMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, smaller than the maximum BXMT drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and BXMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLDTBXMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.52%

-97.98%

+14.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.75%

-12.02%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.89%

-23.29%

-18.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.84%

-43.02%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.52%

-67.86%

-13.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.20%

-35.22%

-9.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.35%

-49.07%

+15.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.26%

5.08%

+3.18%

Volatility

CLDT vs. BXMT - Volatility Comparison

Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT) at 7.31%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLDTBXMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.60%

7.31%

+6.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.97%

16.44%

+7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.61%

21.49%

+9.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.08%

27.72%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.07%

32.61%

+10.46%

Dividends

CLDT vs. BXMT - Dividend Comparison

CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than BXMT's 10.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
10.44%9.83%12.52%11.66%11.71%8.10%9.01%6.66%7.78%7.71%8.25%8.52%
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
3.37%5.29%3.13%2.61%0.57%0.00%2.04%7.20%7.47%5.80%6.72%5.86%

Financials

CLDT vs. BXMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chatham Lodging Trust and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
67.50M
380.15M
(CLDT) Total Revenue
(BXMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLDT vs. BXMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chatham Lodging Trust and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
20.4%
Portfolio components
CLDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 67.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BXMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 77.44M and revenue of 380.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.

CLDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 1.64M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.

BXMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 48.65M and revenue of 380.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

CLDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a net income of -4.42M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.5%.

BXMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -6.30M and revenue of 380.15M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLDT and BXMT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLDT has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to BXMT (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLDT dropped -83.52% vs BXMT's -97.98%.

CLDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLDT and BXMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer