CLCV vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CLCV (Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Crossmark, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). CLCV is actively managed, while FNDF is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLCV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

CLCV vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLCV achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 20.97% return.

CLCV

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 8.12%
• YTD: 14.48%
• 6M: 16.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 5.03%
• YTD: 20.97%
• 6M: 24.09%
• 1Y: 43.94%
• 3Y*: 24.21%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLCV vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLCV Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF	14.48%	4.88%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	20.97%	11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CLCV and FNDF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

CLCV vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLCV vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLCV	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	0.54	+1.43

Drawdowns

CLCV vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLCV drawdown since its inception was -6.94%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCV and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLCV	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-40.14%	+33.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.87%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-7.64%	+6.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLCV	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	15.04%	-3.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.03%	16.18%	-4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.03%	17.67%	-5.64%

CLCV vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLCV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLCV vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

CLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLCV Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF	0.35%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLCV and FNDF in my portfolio?

CLCV and FNDF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLCV or FNDF?

On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLCV or FNDF?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLCV or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.35% for CLCV.

What is the main difference between CLCV and FNDF?

CLCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCV and 0.25% for FNDF.