CLCV vs. DEW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLCV (Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF) and DEW (WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CLCV is actively managed, while DEW is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLCV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DEW.

Performance

CLCV vs. DEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLCV achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than DEW's 11.59% return.

CLCV

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 8.29%
• YTD: 13.65%
• 6M: 16.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DEW

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 11.59%
• 6M: 12.75%
• 1Y: 25.31%
• 3Y*: 18.77%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: 9.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLCV vs. DEW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLCV Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF	13.65%	4.88%
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund	11.59%	6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CLCV and DEW is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

CLCV vs. DEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEW

DEW Risk / Return Rank: 80
DEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DEW Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DEW Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLCV vs. DEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLCV	DEW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	0.28	+1.60

Drawdowns

CLCV vs. DEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLCV drawdown since its inception was -6.94%, smaller than the maximum DEW drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCV and DEW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLCV	DEW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-65.55%	+58.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.86%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-1.29%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	-12.44%	+10.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLCV	DEW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	9.61%	+2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.03%	12.99%	-0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.03%	15.53%	-3.50%

CLCV vs. DEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLCV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DEW's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLCV vs. DEW - Dividend Comparison

CLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than DEW's 3.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLCV Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF	0.35%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund	3.22%	3.71%	4.02%	4.55%	3.82%	3.55%	4.10%	3.74%	4.17%	3.18%	3.42%	4.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLCV and DEW in my portfolio?

CLCV and DEW have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLCV or DEW?

On fees, CLCV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLCV or DEW?

CLCV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DEW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLCV or DEW?

DEW has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.35% for CLCV.

What is the main difference between CLCV and DEW?

They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCV and 0.58% for DEW.