PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLCV vs. TVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLCV vs. TVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLCV achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly lower than TVAL's 15.42% return.


CLCV

1D
-0.54%
1M
8.29%
YTD
13.65%
6M
16.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TVAL

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.86%
YTD
15.42%
6M
16.79%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLCV vs. TVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CLCV
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF
13.65%4.88%
TVAL
T. Rowe Price Value ETF
15.42%7.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CLCV and TVAL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLCV vs. TVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLCV

TVAL
TVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLCV vs. TVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLCV vs. TVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLCVTVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.88

1.48

+0.40

Drawdowns

CLCV vs. TVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLCV drawdown since its inception was -6.94%, smaller than the maximum TVAL drawdown of -14.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCV and TVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLCVTVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-14.84%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.39%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-2.06%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

Volatility

CLCV vs. TVAL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLCVTVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

10.65%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.03%

12.59%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.03%

12.59%

-0.56%

CLCV vs. TVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLCV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TVAL's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLCV vs. TVAL - Dividend Comparison

CLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than TVAL's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CLCV
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF
0.35%0.40%0.00%0.00%
TVAL
T. Rowe Price Value ETF
1.00%1.15%1.16%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLCV and TVAL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TVAL is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TVAL is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLCV.

TVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.35% for CLCV.

They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCV and 0.33% for TVAL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLCV and TVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer