CLCG vs. FITZ
CLCG (Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLCG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
CLCG vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLCG
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLCG vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLCG and FITZ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLCG vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLCG vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLCG drawdown since its inception was -16.32%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -7.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCG and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLCG | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.32% | -7.37% | -8.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -3.47% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -3.97% | +0.13% |
Volatility
CLCG vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLCG | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 16.22% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 16.22% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 16.22% | +1.44% |
CLCG vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLCG vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
CLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLCG and FITZ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLCG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLCG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
CLCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCG and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for CLCG and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer