CLCG vs. FITZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CLCG (Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLCG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.

Performance

CLCG vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLCG

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 8.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FITZ

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLCG vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF	0.25%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CLCG and FITZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.30

Return for Risk

CLCG vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLCG	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	-7.29	+8.50

Drawdowns

CLCG vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLCG drawdown since its inception was -16.32%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCG and FITZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLCG	FITZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.32%	-1.97%	-14.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-1.97%	+0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-1.08%	-2.75%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLCG	FITZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.06%	8.74%	+8.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.06%	8.74%	+8.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.06%	8.74%	+8.32%

CLCG vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLCG vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

CLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF	0.06%	0.07%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLCG and FITZ in my portfolio?

CLCG and FITZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLCG or FITZ?

On fees, CLCG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLCG or FITZ?

CLCG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLCG or FITZ?

CLCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

What is the main difference between CLCG and FITZ?

They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCG and 0.75% for FITZ.