CL vs. PH
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.44%/yr vs 25.97%/yr for PH. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CL vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly higher than PH's 11.56% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 4.44%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 11.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.28%
PH
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 34.58%
- 3Y*
- 34.53%
- 5Y*
- 27.26%
- 10Y*
- 25.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $438.38M | $416.63M | $459.32M | |
| $537.51M | $523.59M | $635.17M |
CL vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 17.64% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 11.56% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and PH is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.25 |
The correlation between CL and PH shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CL:
$73.06B
PH:
$123.13B
CL:
$2.53
PH:
$27.15
CL:
36.15
PH:
35.96
CL:
9.34
PH:
1.52
CL:
3.50
PH:
5.96
CL:
311.74
PH:
8.03
CL:
$21.05B
PH:
$20.99B
CL:
$12.72B
PH:
$7.81B
CL:
$3.68B
PH:
$5.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
CL
PH
CL vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.24 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 1.80 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 5.07 | -3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and PH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -66.92% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.97% | -19.34% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -26.79% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -28.64% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -54.68% | +25.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.03% | -4.33% | -7.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -15.30% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.47% | 6.85% | +1.62% |
Volatility
CL vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 6.43%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 6.43% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.78% | 19.46% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.53% | 25.70% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 28.66% | -9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.87% | 31.62% | -11.75% |
Dividends
CL vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than PH's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.30% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.76% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
CL vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. PH - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.30B and revenue of 5.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 693.00M and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and PH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to PH (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs PH's -66.92%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and PH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer