CL vs. LEG
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.62%/yr vs -11.06%/yr for LEG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 4.62%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.06% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
LEG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 15.59%
- YTD
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -7.69%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- -27.77%
- 5Y*
- -24.81%
- 10Y*
- -11.06%
CL vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -3.16% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and LEG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
CL:
$72.02B
LEG:
$1.49B
CL:
$2.58
LEG:
$1.60
CL:
34.68
LEG:
6.62
CL:
3.48
LEG:
0.49
CL:
496.66
LEG:
1.44
CL:
$20.80B
LEG:
$3.03B
CL:
$12.49B
LEG:
$717.40M
CL:
$3.92B
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
CL
LEG
CL vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.09 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 0.44 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 0.90 | -1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -86.41% | +27.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -28.51% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -77.26% | +48.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -84.96% | +55.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -86.41% | +57.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.31% | -77.60% | +63.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -19.65% | +8.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 13.77% | -2.42% |
Volatility
CL vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 8.32%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 11.98% | -3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.28% | 31.40% | -14.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.83% | 49.76% | -27.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 42.50% | -23.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 39.81% | -20.06% |
Dividends
CL vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than LEG's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.42% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
CL vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and LEG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to CL (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs LEG's -86.41%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer