CL vs. JNJ
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.14%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CL having a 8.73% return and JNJ slightly higher at 9.07%. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 4.14%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- -3.98%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 48.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
CL vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 8.73% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 9.07% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and JNJ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1977 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
CL:
$68.33B
JNJ:
$545.87B
CL:
$2.58
JNJ:
$8.65
CL:
32.90
JNJ:
25.81
CL:
8.50
JNJ:
0.86
CL:
3.30
JNJ:
5.64
CL:
471.23
JNJ:
6.72
CL:
$20.80B
JNJ:
$96.36B
CL:
$12.49B
JNJ:
$66.60B
CL:
$3.92B
JNJ:
$31.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
CL
JNJ
CL vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CL | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | 2.91 | -3.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | 4.26 | -4.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.52 | -0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 4.42 | -4.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 13.33 | -13.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CL | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 2.91 | -3.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.55 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.54 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.53 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
CL vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -50.67% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -10.96% | -7.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -15.95% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -18.41% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -27.37% | -1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.69% | -9.67% | -9.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -11.88% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.21% | 3.63% | +7.58% |
Volatility
CL vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.20%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 5.20% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.66% | 12.17% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.10% | 16.67% | +4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 16.82% | +1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 18.45% | +1.22% |
Dividends
CL vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than JNJ's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.46% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.35% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Financials
CL vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and JNJ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to JNJ (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer