CL vs. JNJ
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.62%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for JNJ. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CL vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 24.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 4.62%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.43% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 9.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.31%
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 24.55%
- 1Y
- 52.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $468.59M | $430.56M | $463.16M | |
| $2.08B | $2.07B | $2.01B |
CL vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 19.23% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 24.55% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and JNJ is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1977 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
CL:
$74.04B
JNJ:
$614.36B
CL:
$2.53
JNJ:
$8.63
CL:
36.63
JNJ:
29.55
CL:
9.46
JNJ:
0.98
CL:
3.55
JNJ:
6.35
CL:
315.94
JNJ:
7.32
CL:
$21.05B
JNJ:
$97.93B
CL:
$12.72B
JNJ:
$68.99B
CL:
$3.68B
JNJ:
$31.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
CL
JNJ
CL vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.50 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 4.84 | -4.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.63 | 13.39 | -11.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -50.67% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.97% | -10.96% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -15.72% | -13.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -18.41% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -27.37% | -1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -4.61% | -6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -11.88% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.50% | 3.95% | +4.55% |
Volatility
CL vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) have volatilities of 7.70% and 7.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 7.58% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.07% | 14.99% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 18.33% | +4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 17.46% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 18.76% | +1.14% |
Dividends
CL vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than JNJ's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.27% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.06% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Financials
CL vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.30B and revenue of 5.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 18.50B and revenue of 25.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 7.17B and revenue of 25.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.3%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 693.00M and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.53B and revenue of 25.31B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and JNJ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to JNJ (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer