CL vs. GRC
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and GRC (The Gorman-Rupp Company) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while GRC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.62%/yr vs 14.19%/yr for GRC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL vs. GRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly lower than GRC's 78.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed GRC with an annualized return of 4.62%, while GRC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
GRC
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 15.40%
- YTD
- 78.10%
- 6M
- 71.53%
- 1Y
- 141.48%
- 3Y*
- 48.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
CL vs. GRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 78.10% | 28.24% | 8.87% | 42.15% | -41.17% | 39.71% | -11.90% | 17.64% | 11.75% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and GRC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CL and GRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CL:
$72.02B
GRC:
$2.23B
CL:
$2.58
GRC:
$2.23
CL:
34.68
GRC:
37.88
CL:
8.96
GRC:
0.77
CL:
3.48
GRC:
3.20
CL:
496.66
GRC:
2.59
CL:
$20.80B
GRC:
$695.03M
CL:
$12.49B
GRC:
$210.01M
CL:
$3.92B
GRC:
$118.94M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. GRC — Risk / Return Rank
CL
GRC
CL vs. GRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.59 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 9.33 | -9.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 28.85 | -28.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. GRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum GRC drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and GRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -67.23% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -14.39% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -26.87% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -49.26% | +20.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -49.26% | +20.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.31% | 0.00% | -14.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -17.63% | +6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 4.67% | +6.68% |
Volatility
CL vs. GRC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 8.32%, while The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) has a volatility of 10.35%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 10.35% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.28% | 28.10% | -10.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.83% | 34.75% | -12.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 30.83% | -12.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 34.02% | -14.27% |
Dividends
CL vs. GRC - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than GRC's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 0.89% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 1.98% | 2.67% | 1.43% | 1.82% | 1.47% | 7.74% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
Financials
CL vs. GRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and The Gorman-Rupp Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. GRC - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
GRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 57.36M and revenue of 176.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
GRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 27.48M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
GRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and GRC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRC has higher volatility (10.35%) compared to CL (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs GRC's -67.23%.
GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and GRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer