GRC vs. NUE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) and Nucor Corporation (NUE).

Performance

GRC vs. NUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) and Nucor Corporation (NUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GRC vs. NUE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company	30.49%	28.24%	8.87%	42.15%	-41.17%	39.71%	-11.90%	17.64%	11.75%	2.49%
NUE Nucor Corporation	4.03%	42.03%	-31.95%	33.75%	17.39%	118.45%	-1.77%	11.84%	-16.36%	9.60%

Fundamentals

EPS GRC : $3.03 NUE : $7.54
PE Ratio GRC : 20.53 NUE : 22.41
PS Ratio GRC : 1.60 NUE : 1.20
Total Revenue (TTM) GRC : $682.39M NUE : $32.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) GRC : $206.06M NUE : $3.88B
EBITDA (TTM) GRC : $115.01M NUE : $4.20B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRC achieves a 30.49% return, which is significantly higher than NUE's 4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GRC has underperformed NUE with an annualized return of 11.75%, while NUE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.

GRC

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -3.27%
• YTD: 30.49%
• 6M: 34.81%
• 1Y: 79.90%
• 3Y*: 38.17%
• 5Y*: 15.44%
• 10Y*: 11.75%

NUE

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: 4.03%
• 6M: 25.71%
• 1Y: 42.65%
• 3Y*: 4.57%
• 5Y*: 17.97%
• 10Y*: 16.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GRC vs. NUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRC

GRC Risk / Return Rank: 94
GRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GRC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GRC Martin Ratio Rank: 94

NUE

NUE Risk / Return Rank: 78
NUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
NUE Omega Ratio Rank: 74
NUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
NUE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRC vs. NUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) and Nucor Corporation (NUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GRC	NUE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	1.22	+1.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	1.81	+1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.23	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.47	2.25	+3.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.24	6.01	+9.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GRC vs. NUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRC Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the NUE Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRC and NUE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRC	NUE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	1.22	+1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.47	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.45	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.39	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between GRC and NUE is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GRC vs. NUE - Dividend Comparison

GRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than NUE's 1.31% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company	1.21%	1.56%	1.91%	1.98%	2.67%	1.43%	1.82%	1.47%	7.74%	1.51%	1.39%	1.52%
NUE Nucor Corporation	1.31%	1.35%	1.86%	1.19%	1.52%	1.50%	3.03%	2.85%	2.97%	2.38%	2.52%	3.70%

Drawdowns

GRC vs. NUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRC drawdown since its inception was -67.23%, roughly equal to the maximum NUE drawdown of -68.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRC and NUE.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRC	NUE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.23%	-68.34%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.39%	-18.43%	+4.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.26%	-47.79%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.26%	-57.21%	+7.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.82%	-13.17%	+5.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.72%	-21.22%	+3.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	6.89%	-1.72%

Volatility

GRC vs. NUE - Volatility Comparison

The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Nucor Corporation (NUE) at 7.26%. This indicates that GRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRC	NUE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	7.26%	+5.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.03%	20.52%	+2.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.42%	35.26%	-2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.71%	38.12%	-8.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.82%	35.86%	-2.04%

Financials

GRC vs. NUE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Gorman-Rupp Company and Nucor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 52.34M and revenue of 166.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

NUE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nucor Corporation reported a gross profit of 862.00M and revenue of 7.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.

GRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 24.85M and revenue of 166.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

NUE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nucor Corporation reported an operating income of 528.00M and revenue of 7.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

GRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 13.75M and revenue of 166.57M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

NUE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nucor Corporation reported a net income of 378.00M and revenue of 7.69B, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.