CL vs. CHD
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and CHD (Church & Dwight Co., Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.62%/yr vs 8.34%/yr for CHD. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL vs. CHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly lower than CHD's 17.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed CHD with an annualized return of 4.62%, while CHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- -1.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
CHD
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 16.04%
- 1Y
- -0.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
CL vs. CHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 17.09% | -18.91% | 11.96% | 18.72% | -20.41% | 18.89% | 25.46% | 8.36% | 33.23% | 15.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and CHD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1986 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, CL and CHD have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CL:
$72.02B
CHD:
$23.23B
CL:
$2.58
CHD:
$3.02
CL:
34.68
CHD:
32.30
CL:
8.96
CHD:
3.53
CL:
3.48
CHD:
3.82
CL:
496.66
CHD:
5.55
CL:
$20.80B
CHD:
$6.21B
CL:
$12.49B
CHD:
$2.80B
CL:
$3.92B
CHD:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. CHD — Risk / Return Rank
CL
CHD
CL vs. CHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | -0.01 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | -0.03 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. CHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than CHD's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and CHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -51.52% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -17.18% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -27.28% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -31.72% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -31.72% | +2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.31% | -12.41% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -12.01% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 9.41% | +1.94% |
Volatility
CL vs. CHD - Volatility Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) at 7.00%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 7.00% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.28% | 15.90% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.83% | 21.99% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 20.65% | -1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 21.85% | -2.10% |
Dividends
CL vs. CHD - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than CHD's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.30% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.61% | 1.58% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Financials
CL vs. CHD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. CHD - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
CHD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 681.40M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
CHD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 291.00M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
CHD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 216.30M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and CHD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to CHD (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs CHD's -51.52%.
CHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and CHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer