CL vs. BIP
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and BIP (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while BIP operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.62%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for BIP. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL vs. BIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than BIP's 12.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed BIP with an annualized return of 4.62%, while BIP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
BIP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 21.92%
- 3Y*
- 6.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
CL vs. BIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
BIP Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP | 12.75% | 15.15% | 6.40% | 6.64% | -20.73% | 27.77% | 15.45% | 51.38% | -19.15% | 39.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and BIP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2008 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CL and BIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CL:
$72.02B
BIP:
$17.60B
CL:
$2.58
BIP:
$0.91
CL:
34.68
BIP:
42.26
CL:
8.96
BIP:
0.22
CL:
3.48
BIP:
0.73
CL:
496.66
BIP:
3.81
CL:
$20.80B
BIP:
$24.01B
CL:
$12.49B
BIP:
$6.49B
CL:
$3.92B
BIP:
$11.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. BIP — Risk / Return Rank
CL
BIP
CL vs. BIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | BIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.17 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 1.51 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 3.27 | -3.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. BIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than BIP's maximum drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and BIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | BIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -56.07% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -12.50% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -41.05% | +12.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -49.85% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -51.33% | +22.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.31% | -2.58% | -11.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -10.25% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 5.76% | +5.59% |
Volatility
CL vs. BIP - Volatility Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP) at 4.97%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | BIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 4.97% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.28% | 15.04% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.83% | 19.67% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 26.66% | -7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 28.01% | -8.26% |
Dividends
CL vs. BIP - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than BIP's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP | 4.62% | 4.95% | 5.10% | 4.86% | 4.65% | 3.35% | 3.92% | 4.02% | 5.44% | 3.88% | 4.62% | 5.59% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Financials
CL vs. BIP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. BIP - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
BIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
BIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
BIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and BIP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to BIP (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs BIP's -56.07%.
BIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and BIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer