CIFU vs. BMNU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from REX. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.

Performance

CIFU vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 94.41% return, which is significantly higher than BMNU's -81.71% return.

CIFU

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: 42.63%
• YTD: 94.41%
• 6M: 64.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNU

• 1D: -8.91%
• 1M: -39.90%
• YTD: -81.71%
• 6M: -84.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFU vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	94.41%	-13.41%
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF	-81.71%	-10.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFU and BMNU is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

CIFU vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CIFU vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -97.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and BMNU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFU	BMNU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.20%	-97.77%	+20.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.48%	-97.77%	+87.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.93%	-80.50%	+37.57%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFU	BMNU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	207.07%	185.23%	+21.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	207.07%	185.23%	+21.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	207.07%	185.23%	+21.84%

CIFU vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CIFU and BMNU have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

Dividends

CIFU vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFU nor BMNU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFU and BMNU in my portfolio?

CIFU and BMNU have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFU or BMNU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFU or BMNU?

CIFU and BMNU have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFU or BMNU?

CIFU and BMNU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.