CIFR vs. PUMP

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

CIFR (Cipher Digital Inc.) and PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) are both stocks. CIFR operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while PUMP operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 3 years, CIFR returned 104.83%/yr vs 23.57%/yr for PUMP. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CIFR vs. PUMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 77.57% return, which is significantly higher than PUMP's 56.15% return.

CIFR

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 28.92%
• YTD: 77.57%
• 6M: 74.85%
• 1Y: 566.92%
• 3Y*: 104.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PUMP

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -14.90%
• YTD: 56.15%
• 6M: 55.99%
• 1Y: 130.59%
• 3Y*: 23.57%
• 5Y*: 7.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFR vs. PUMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CIFR Cipher Digital Inc.	77.57%	218.10%	12.35%	637.50%	-87.90%	-54.65%
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp.	56.15%	1.93%	11.34%	-19.19%	28.02%	3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFR and PUMP is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021	0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap CIFR : $10.62B PUMP : $1.74B
EPS CIFR : -$2.33 PUMP : -$0.22
PS Ratio CIFR : 57.60 PUMP : 1.76
PB Ratio CIFR : 14.87 PUMP : 1.76
Total Revenue (TTM) CIFR : $174.98M PUMP : $909.74M
Gross Profit (TTM) CIFR : -$172.84M PUMP : $79.21M
EBITDA (TTM) CIFR : -$169.22M PUMP : $158.47M

Return for Risk

CIFR vs. PUMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFR

CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 96
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

PUMP

PUMP Risk / Return Rank: 86
PUMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PUMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PUMP Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PUMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PUMP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFR vs. PUMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIFR	PUMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.25	1.66	+3.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	2.87	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.34	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.13	4.01	+7.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.33	8.86	+13.48

CIFR vs. PUMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 5.25, which is higher than the PUMP Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and PUMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. PUMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum PUMP drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and PUMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFR	PUMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.16%	-93.88%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.38%	-32.74%	-18.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-71.74%	-59.13%	-12.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-72.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-39.78%	+39.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.13%	-52.14%	-13.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.57%	14.80%	+10.77%

Volatility

CIFR vs. PUMP - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 29.61% compared to ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) at 18.10%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIFR	PUMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.61%	18.10%	+11.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	71.69%	39.69%	+32.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.14%	79.15%	+29.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.90%	62.31%	+59.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.90%	70.95%	+50.95%

Dividends

CIFR vs. PUMP - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor PUMP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFR and PUMP in my portfolio?

CIFR and PUMP have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIFR or PUMP?

CIFR has higher volatility (29.61%) compared to PUMP (18.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIFR dropped -97.16% vs PUMP's -93.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.25 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.