CIFR vs. WULF

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a -16.81% return, which is significantly higher than WULF's -31.27% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the WULF Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and WULF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CIFR nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and WULF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) is 31.00%, while TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a volatility of 35.37%. This indicates that CIFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.