PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIFR vs. WULF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CIFR and WULF is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

CIFR vs. WULF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-76.05%
-88.24%
CIFR
WULF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CIFR:

-0.47

WULF:

0.08

Sortino Ratio

CIFR:

-0.17

WULF:

1.00

Omega Ratio

CIFR:

0.98

WULF:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

CIFR:

-0.62

WULF:

0.10

Martin Ratio

CIFR:

-1.60

WULF:

0.29

Ulcer Index

CIFR:

32.56%

WULF:

32.28%

Daily Std Dev

CIFR:

112.16%

WULF:

115.87%

Max Drawdown

CIFR:

-97.16%

WULF:

-98.50%

Current Drawdown

CIFR:

-83.06%

WULF:

-92.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIFR:

$889.36M

WULF:

$1.10B

EPS

CIFR:

-$0.14

WULF:

-$0.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIFR:

$103.13M

WULF:

$97.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIFR:

-$12.42M

WULF:

$49.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIFR:

-$2.27M

WULF:

-$28.91M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CIFR having a -46.98% return and WULF slightly lower at -49.12%.


CIFR

YTD

-46.98%

1M

-39.71%

6M

-31.28%

1Y

-49.59%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

WULF

YTD

-49.12%

1M

-31.26%

6M

-33.49%

1Y

18.52%

5Y*

1.29%

10Y*

-14.41%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIFR vs. WULF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CIFR is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CIFR is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CIFR is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CIFR is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CIFR is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CIFR is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

WULF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WULF is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WULF is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WULF is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WULF is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WULF is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WULF is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CIFR vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIFR, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CIFR: -0.47
WULF: 0.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIFR, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CIFR: -0.17
WULF: 1.00
The chart of Omega ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CIFR: 0.98
WULF: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIFR, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CIFR: -0.62
WULF: 0.10
The chart of Martin ratio for CIFR, currently valued at -1.60, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CIFR: -1.60
WULF: 0.29

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the WULF Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and WULF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.47
0.08
CIFR
WULF

Dividends

CIFR vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%33.22%

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and WULF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-83.06%
-92.02%
CIFR
WULF

Volatility

CIFR vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 36.27% compared to TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) at 34.49%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
36.27%
34.49%
CIFR
WULF

Financials

CIFR vs. WULF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab