CIFR vs. WULF
Compare and contrast key facts about Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CIFR or WULF.
Key characteristics
| CIFR | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -10.65% | -11.67% |
| 1Y Return | 63.27% | 19.10% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -28.54% | -36.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.64 | 0.22 |
| Daily Std Dev | 118.19% | 121.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.16% | -98.50% |
| Current Drawdown | -74.59% | -94.12% |
Fundamentals
| CIFR | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $746.52M |
| EPS | -$0.10 | -$0.35 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126.84M | $69.23M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.29M | $3.95M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.28M | $138.00K |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFR and WULF is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CIFR vs. WULF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a -10.65% return, which is significantly higher than WULF's -11.67% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CIFR vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CIFR vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFR nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% |
Drawdowns
CIFR vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and WULF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CIFR vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison
Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 29.62% compared to TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) at 23.86%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CIFR vs. WULF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities