PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIFR vs. WULF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CIFR and WULF is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CIFR vs. WULF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
22.01%
56.65%
CIFR
WULF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CIFR:

0.24

WULF:

1.92

Sortino Ratio

CIFR:

1.34

WULF:

2.72

Omega Ratio

CIFR:

1.14

WULF:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

CIFR:

0.34

WULF:

2.48

Martin Ratio

CIFR:

0.91

WULF:

8.55

Ulcer Index

CIFR:

31.60%

WULF:

27.95%

Daily Std Dev

CIFR:

121.50%

WULF:

124.50%

Max Drawdown

CIFR:

-97.16%

WULF:

-98.50%

Current Drawdown

CIFR:

-64.12%

WULF:

-81.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIFR:

$2.51B

WULF:

$3.16B

EPS

CIFR:

-$0.15

WULF:

-$0.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIFR:

$152.47M

WULF:

$128.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIFR:

-$3.35M

WULF:

$53.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIFR:

$40.93M

WULF:

$19.78M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 26.15% return, which is significantly lower than WULF's 175.42% return.


CIFR

YTD

26.15%

1M

-23.16%

6M

22.01%

1Y

29.28%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

WULF

YTD

175.42%

1M

-5.44%

6M

58.89%

1Y

207.44%

5Y*

6.66%

10Y*

-6.40%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIFR vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.241.75
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.342.63
The chart of Omega ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.141.28
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.342.26
The chart of Martin ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.917.78
CIFR
WULF

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the WULF Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and WULF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.24
1.75
CIFR
WULF

Dividends

CIFR vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%33.22%

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and WULF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-64.12%
-81.67%
CIFR
WULF

Volatility

CIFR vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 40.31% compared to TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) at 38.09%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
40.31%
38.09%
CIFR
WULF

Financials

CIFR vs. WULF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab