PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIFR vs. CLSK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CIFR vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
65.80%
-14.35%
CIFR
CLSK

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 64.16% return, which is significantly higher than CLSK's 36.90% return.


CIFR

YTD

64.16%

1M

31.65%

6M

65.77%

1Y

165.88%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

CLSK

YTD

36.90%

1M

29.84%

6M

-14.35%

1Y

210.70%

5Y (annualized)

20.87%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Fundamentals


CIFRCLSK
Market Cap$2.32B$3.65B
EPS-$0.15-$0.99
Total Revenue (TTM)$152.47M$289.69M
Gross Profit (TTM)-$3.35M$115.16M
EBITDA (TTM)$40.93M$25.87M

Key characteristics


CIFRCLSK
Sharpe Ratio1.381.72
Sortino Ratio2.432.74
Omega Ratio1.261.30
Calmar Ratio1.972.28
Martin Ratio5.285.74
Ulcer Index31.40%36.70%
Daily Std Dev120.17%122.38%
Max Drawdown-97.16%-98.56%
Current Drawdown-53.31%-79.18%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CIFR and CLSK is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIFR vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.381.72
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.432.74
The chart of Omega ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.261.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.972.81
The chart of Martin ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 5.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.285.74
CIFR
CLSK

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and CLSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.38
1.72
CIFR
CLSK

Dividends

CIFR vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and CLSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-53.31%
-35.47%
CIFR
CLSK

Volatility

CIFR vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) is 34.99%, while CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a volatility of 47.39%. This indicates that CIFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
34.99%
47.39%
CIFR
CLSK

Financials

CIFR vs. CLSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items