CIFR vs. CLSK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK).

Performance

CIFR vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CIFR vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc.	-14.36%	218.10%	12.35%	637.50%	-87.90%	-54.92%
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc.	-14.82%	9.88%	-16.50%	440.69%	-78.57%	-30.21%

Fundamentals

EPS CIFR : -$2.18 CLSK : -$1.28
PS Ratio CIFR : 18.59 CLSK : 2.23
Total Revenue (TTM) CIFR : $256.76M CLSK : $785.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) CIFR : $101.17M CLSK : $256.57M
EBITDA (TTM) CIFR : -$572.32M CLSK : $131.94M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CIFR having a -14.36% return and CLSK slightly lower at -14.82%.

CIFR

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: -19.80%
• YTD: -14.36%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 413.82%
• 3Y*: 75.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSK

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -18.29%
• YTD: -14.82%
• 6M: -40.92%
• 1Y: 14.02%
• 3Y*: 45.82%
• 5Y*: -17.81%
• 10Y*: -11.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CIFR vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFR

CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 95
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CLSK

CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 50
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFR vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIFR	CLSK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.77	0.16	+3.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	0.92	+2.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.10	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.75	0.44	+8.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.89	0.83	+18.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIFR vs. CLSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is higher than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and CLSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIFR	CLSK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77	0.16	+3.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	-0.06	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between CIFR and CLSK is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CIFR vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and CLSK.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFR	CLSK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.16%	-98.56%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.38%	-64.74%	+13.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-92.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.85%	-88.19%	+39.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.31%	-69.28%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.80%	34.21%	-10.41%

Volatility

CIFR vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 28.42% compared to CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) at 21.41%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIFR	CLSK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.42%	21.41%	+7.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	79.50%	70.96%	+8.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.89%	91.38%	+19.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	122.74%	101.40%	+21.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	122.74%	184.27%	-61.53%

Financials