CIFR vs. CLSK

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 18.32% return, which is significantly higher than CLSK's 0.43% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and CLSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CIFR nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and CLSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 37.57% compared to CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) at 22.49%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.