PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIFR vs. CLSK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CIFRCLSK
YTD Return-2.18%64.28%
1Y Return74.89%363.43%
3Y Return (Ann)-26.41%-5.43%
Sharpe Ratio0.613.05
Daily Std Dev118.51%117.17%
Max Drawdown-97.16%-98.56%
Current Drawdown-72.18%-75.02%

Fundamentals


CIFRCLSK
Market Cap$1.33B$4.33B
EPS-$0.10-$0.69
Revenue (TTM)$126.84M$214.38M
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.29M$90.29M
EBITDA (TTM)$2.28M$60.21M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CIFR and CLSK is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CIFR vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's 64.28% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
15.77%
343.00%
CIFR
CLSK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cipher Mining Inc.

CleanSpark, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIFR vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIFR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.11
CLSK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 3.05, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.003.05
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 3.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.90
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 12.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.28

CIFR vs. CLSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CIFR and CLSK.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.61
3.05
CIFR
CLSK

Dividends

CIFR vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and CLSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-72.18%
-54.85%
CIFR
CLSK

Volatility

CIFR vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 31.49% compared to CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) at 27.42%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%55.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
31.49%
27.42%
CIFR
CLSK

Financials

CIFR vs. CLSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items