CIFG vs. SPUU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CIFG is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIFG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for SPUU.

Performance

CIFG vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 92.34% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 19.82% return.

CIFG

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 94.51%
• YTD: 92.34%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPUU

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 10.01%
• YTD: 19.82%
• 6M: 19.11%
• 1Y: 53.61%
• 3Y*: 38.21%
• 5Y*: 20.19%
• 10Y*: 24.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	92.34%	-42.39%
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares	19.82%	-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and SPUU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

CIFG vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUU

SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 63
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFG vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIFG	SPUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.63	-0.51

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and SPUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFG	SPUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.71%	-59.35%	-12.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-1.27%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.01%	-9.51%	-28.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFG	SPUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.83%	23.90%	+179.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.83%	33.46%	+170.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.83%	35.77%	+168.06%

CIFG vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIFG vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares	1.34%	1.63%	0.55%	0.83%	0.88%	3.04%	8.03%	1.80%	5.50%	6.96%	8.08%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFG and SPUU in my portfolio?

CIFG and SPUU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFG or SPUU?

On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFG or SPUU?

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CIFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFG or SPUU?

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.

What is the main difference between CIFG and SPUU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CIFG and 0.64% for SPUU.