PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFG vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIFG vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 96.56% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 647.02% return.


CIFG

1D
-3.87%
1M
42.24%
YTD
96.56%
6M
67.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMG

1D
-20.34%
1M
24.90%
YTD
647.02%
6M
611.39%
1Y
232.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and ARMG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFG vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFG vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIFGARMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

CIFG vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFGARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-80.28%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.44%

-31.86%

+21.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.54%

-51.77%

+16.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.00%

Volatility

CIFG vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFGARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

71.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

117.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

205.93%

141.46%

+64.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

205.93%

143.77%

+62.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

205.93%

143.77%

+62.16%

CIFG vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CIFG and ARMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

CIFG vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIFG and ARMG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIFG and ARMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFG and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer