CIBR vs. TRUT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CIBR is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.

Performance

CIBR vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

TRUT

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 16.68%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 6M: 24.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	0.08%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	25.30%	10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and TRUT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025	0.56

Return for Risk

CIBR vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIBR	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIBR	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	2.39	-1.73

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and TRUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR	TRUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-18.55%	-15.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-1.46%	-1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-5.17%	-3.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIBR	TRUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.50%	21.53%	+2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.95%	21.53%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	21.53%	+2.07%

CIBR vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIBR vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.19%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIBR and TRUT in my portfolio?

CIBR and TRUT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIBR or TRUT?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIBR or TRUT?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIBR or TRUT?

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.

What is the main difference between CIBR and TRUT?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.13% for TRUT.